Netskope NextGen SWG vs. Sophos Cloud Web Gateway (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Netskope NextGen SWG
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Netskope’s NextGen SWG delivers cloud-based web security defenses, and detects malicious activity and threats with pre-execution script analysis and heuristics, dynamic sandboxing, and machine learning anomaly detection to protect data and users as they use and traverse the web.N/A
Sophos Cloud Web Gateway (discontinued)
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Sophos Cloud Web Gateway has been discontinued since 30 June 2020.N/A
Pricing
Netskope NextGen SWGSophos Cloud Web Gateway (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Netskope NextGen SWGSophos Cloud Web Gateway (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Netskope NextGen SWGSophos Cloud Web Gateway (discontinued)
User Ratings
Netskope NextGen SWGSophos Cloud Web Gateway (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Netskope NextGen SWGSophos Cloud Web Gateway (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Scenarios Well Suited - Replace On Premises Proxies - Control Work from Home users - Data Loss Prevention to data storage in cloud services - Control could be applied to the most used type of operate systems ( Windows, MAC, IOS adn Android) Scenarios Less Appropriate - Shared Devices - Access to the Internal Applications
Read full review
Sophos Secure Web Gateway works perfectly for any SMB/Enterprise environment where the IT Admin wants to control the internet. With that said, I can not think of an organization that doesn't need to control or audit the usage of their internet.
Read full review
Pros
  • Control Web Traffic
  • SSL Decrypt
  • Control Web 2.0
  • Threat Protection
  • DLP
Read full review
  • When IT Admins need to deploy virtually.
  • When IT Admins want to have high availability without an extra cost (via the Virtual Appliance Deployment).
  • When IT Admins want to control and give the internet fair use within the organization.
Read full review
Cons
  • Reporting
  • Integration with Azure AD
  • Deploy Procedure
Read full review
  • Administrator Permissions: There's not enough granularity on the administrative side. We ran into an issue where we wanted to restrict junior admins from being able to see traffic per user. But in doing so, it also prevented them from adusting some other settings they had to have access to, like setting exceptions for sites.
  • CA Database: I occasionally run into issues where the list of certificate authorities in the appliance is not up to date, and I have to manually add a CA. These aren't rare, never-heard-of authorities, either, but they are usually subsidiaries of one of the major ones.
  • Feedback: Sometimes it takes some good detective skills to track down why a legitimate site isn't working. It's often because of content hosted elsewhere (images, for example), but the reports aren't always clear as to what actually gets blocked. It takes some trial and error sometimes to unblock something that should be okay for our business.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The netskope next gen swg win the evaluation process in the follow features: - Better Deploy process - Don't depend of a VPN connection - Native SSL Decryption - WebUI of easy and quickly understanding - Device compliance evaluation - Flexible Scenarios of Deployment - A private network what connect more efficiently to the most used SaaS Services
Read full review
I had experience in the past with Barracuda and WatchGuard. Barracuda was fine, although I found it harder to configure and administrate. Less intuitive, but possibly more robust. WatchGuard was a nightmare, it either blocked too many things or not enough, and the rules were too complex. I would pick Sophos over either of these, both for ease of use, and for cost.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Complete Control of Web access regardless the location of user
  • Deep Application control ( Eg. Allow access just the company tenant of a SaaS App)
  • No Restrictions about the device type ( Eg. Windows, MAC and mobiles)
Read full review
  • We have not had a single instance of malware since installing Web Gateway. We have other ways to prevent infections and attacks, of course, so this is just one tool in the box, but we had a handful before this from people visiting sites they should not have. Web Gateway has prevented those, at least.
  • There was some pushback initially as users had to deal with some business sites not working (usually due to CA problems). After the initial growing pains, however, we've seen very few other problems.
  • The appliance updates itself, in the middle of the night, so that reduces some overhead and planned downtime.
Read full review
ScreenShots