Netlink Data Center Disaster Recovery vs. Arcserve ShadowProtect

If we have a scenario where we need very fast backup/ a lot of backups per hour we tend to go towards ShadowProtect , we have several customers with important servers that we backup each 15 minutes with a VSS consistent snapshot. The continuous incremental option also allows us to create one "full backup" and never again afterwards. This gives us the possibility to give longer retention periods to our customers.

Incentivized

• Shadowprotect has a relatively simple interface so it's easy to set up.
• Due to the simple UI, it is easy to restore files.
• Imagemanage works fairly well once it's set up and doesn't need much babysitting.

Incentivized

• The replication offsite can have issues over time. It takes manual involvement to keep it working right.
• SPX remote management isn't easy out of the box.

Incentivized

We don’t need support often, but when we do, the support has been strong. Sometimes it is hard to determine how to access support for the exact issue we are having. There are a decent forum and online ticketing system. Support for the cloud center seems to be provided only by phone, though.

Incentivized

ShadowProtect is less expensive than some and more robust than others, and for us, provided a fine medium on which to build our support platform. The MSP interface for SPX makes licenses easy to track and deploy, as well as to retire. Overall, have been satisfied with this choice.

Incentivized

• It had a positive ROI due to the ability to offer better backup technology to our clients.
• There is a large up-front fee you need to pay, though, as you need a minimum number of licenses to resell as MSP.

Incentivized