NetApp AFF A-Series vs. Supermicro SuperStorage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
NetApp AFF A-Series
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
NetApp AFF A-Series All Flash Arrays are the company's flagship flash storage solutions.N/A
Supermicro SuperStorage
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Supermicro SuperStorage systems offer a portfolio of choice in storage subsystems ranging from low-latency NVMe systems, density-optimized systems with 2.5" or 3.5" SAS3/SATA3 storage media, to JBODs and JBOFs for economical storage expansion. The Supermicro SuperStorage systems include designs with 2U, 3U, and 4U form factors using 2.5" or 3.5" SSDs/HDDs; plus innovative 1U Petabyte scale All-Flash NVMe systems with industry standard U.2/NF1/EDSFF drives. SuperStorage servers…N/A
Pricing
NetApp AFF A-SeriesSupermicro SuperStorage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NetApp AFF A-SeriesSupermicro SuperStorage
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NetApp AFF A-SeriesSupermicro SuperStorage
Features
NetApp AFF A-SeriesSupermicro SuperStorage
Enterprise Flash Array Storage
Comparison of Enterprise Flash Array Storage features of Product A and Product B
NetApp AFF A-Series
8.3
Ratings
8% below category average
Supermicro SuperStorage
-
Ratings
Flash Array Performance9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Flash Array Integration9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Compression6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Non-Intrusive Upgrades8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Simplicity8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Power Savings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
NetApp AFF A-SeriesSupermicro SuperStorage
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 10.0 out of 10
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 10.0 out of 10
NetApp AFF A-Series
NetApp AFF A-Series
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
NetApp AFF A-SeriesSupermicro SuperStorage
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
NetApp AFF A-SeriesSupermicro SuperStorage
Likelihood to Recommend
Easy interface and the accessibility of the features are effective and this solution functionalities on data migration and processing of different from other packages is amazing. NetApp AFF A-Series All Flash Arrays is the most secure platform for easy management of all the business and project data and the capacity planning tools and even the configuration options are the best and easy to use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Protective multiple project and business data is excellent.
  • Solutions for data storage and data migration.
  • Providing useful and quality data reports is effective.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • As always, Netapp upgrades are really painful. I wish there was an easy way of upgrading Netapp.
  • GUI is hard to use and CLI is even worse. GUI is confusing and you click all over the place before you get over the learning curve. CLI has changed from the 7-mode days and is very confusing to use. I have had scenarios where the support themselves use documentation to put in the proper commands.
  • Like any array, Netapp's CDOT has it's own bugs in the software. We learnt the hard way when one of our nodes went down and a bug prevented take over of SCSI services which resulted in an APD situation on all our ESXI hosts. Was a nightmare rebooting all the VM's and ESXI's to relieve them of the APD's. People don't pay millions towards a storage platform to go through nightmares.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Our organizations primary storage platform is NetApp AFF-A900 nodes. All our storage requirements, be it storage visible to our compute either using FC or NFS is through these nodes. The shares or CIFS too are setup on these nodes. We also use the fabric pool to write the data to NetApps Storage Grid
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The IBM All Flash FAS was similar in performance and price, but we were already a NetApp shop. This made the decision easier to go with the NetApp AFF system so it would tie in with our SnapManager architecture, as well as keep the learning curve short.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Epic, our EMR providor, has very aggressive guidelines for performance. The Netapp AFF meets those guidlines easily eben in a mixed workload environment. This has helped us meet our business objectives by not having to diversify our storage platforms or vendors.
  • Multi-protocol support (block (ISCSI/FiberChannel) or File (NFS/CIFS)) Allows us to use the Netapp systems to solve all storage requirements regardless of the system needing storage
  • Clustered technologies along with non-disruptive movement of data between nodes on the cluster make hardware refreshes simple and allows the business to keep running without interruption even during massive data moves.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots