LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester vs. PingPlotter

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester offers user-configured AutoTests for a wide range of tasks. This network tester’s cable test and switch identification facilitate problem isolation. The device is supported by netAlly after NETSCOUT divested its handheld troubleshooting devices in 2018. The LinkRunner device replaces the former and now obsolete OneTouch AT network troubleshooting technology acquired from Seattle-based Fluke Networks by NETSCOUT in 2015.N/A
PingPlotter
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
PingPlotter is a graphical traceroute and ping tool that visualizes network performance in a way that makes identifying the source of problems quicker and easier for everyone from online gamers and video streamers to VoIP admins and IT pros. Features for remote deployment, network monitoring, scripting, and a web interface are included along with several additional capabilities.
$0
per user
Pricing
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTesterPingPlotter
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
PingPlotter Free
$0.00
per user
PingPlotter Free
$0.00
per user
PingPlotter Standard
$6.99
per user per month
PingPlotter Professional
$29.00
per user per month
PingPlotter Standard
$39.99
per user
PingPlotter Professional
$349.00
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTesterPingPlotter
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTesterPingPlotter
Features
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTesterPingPlotter
Network Performance Monitoring
Comparison of Network Performance Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester
-
Ratings
PingPlotter
8.2
Ratings
0% above category average
Automated network device discovery00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Network monitoring00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Baseline threshold calculation00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Alerts00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Customizable reports00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTesterPingPlotter
Small Businesses
Auvik
Auvik
Score 9.9 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.0 out of 10
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.0 out of 10
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTesterPingPlotter
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTesterPingPlotter
Likelihood to Recommend
All network administrators would be able to find a use for this tool in their environment. It allows people from outside of the networking industry to capture data required for a quick diagnosis. Things that typically would require me to be onsite for diagnosis can now be handed to Tier 1 techs for data collection and reporting. Since moving toward cable certification, we've experienced an almost unbelievably low level of cable failure. When it does happen, though, there is no guessing. Our Fluke units tell us what the problem is and where.
Read full review
The best scenario and best results are seen when the path does not reuse the same device for the "next hop". It is less well suited in situations where the path is being tricked by the re-use of devices for the next interface. This is seen required in many networks where the proper type of connection is not on an end device and the core device is used to provide a fiber to copper sort of "pass-through" connection.
Read full review
Pros
  • Identify the exact switchport a given line is plugged in to.
  • View the length and viability of any category or fiber optic cable.
  • It acts as a premade packet capture device, simple enough to walk someone through deploying while I'm offsite.
  • In the event LLDP based identification of a port fails, it has the ability to blink a switchport allowing for manual identification.
Read full review
  • Monitor traffic in network
  • Measure stops when contacting network locations such as websites
  • Measures the lag and latency it takes to contact network locations
  • Gives you both induvidual measurements as well as good oversight
  • identifies when network lag or disconnect occurs
Read full review
Cons
  • It could be updated for Mgig or 10Gb.
  • Some devices should have SFP+ modules capabilities
  • Could be combined with other tools
Read full review
  • Its a little confusing to see which targets are currently running pings and which ones are displayed in the plots.
  • Starting and stopping pings requires a right click and that would be better with a play/pause button I think.
  • Ability to drag and drop the graphs to reorder them.
  • more columns to show which targets are running and which are displayed. Currently this is done with symbols so you cant sort by just the running targets for example I've found.
Read full review
Usability
The network tester is one of the easest devices I have ever used. It does have capabilities that other testers simply don't have. Being able to identify the switch port it is plugged into, the address of the switch, the switch name, along with the VLAN has helped on so many occasions
Read full review
I installed it and it just started working. I realized I could then tweak it to show what I needed but didn't have to spend a long time configuring it before use, editing YAML files etc. Maybe that's fine for a network professional, but I only need this software if something goes wrong, and then need it to work quickly out of the box.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have not had much contact with the PingPlotter support, only one time have I went to them and it was a positive experience. The questions I had were answered quickly and professionally. I have no issue with the experience I had with the Support team. This was from before and after the purchase of the product.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I feel that the LinkRunner autotester is just a simple device with an extremely easy to use and understand interface. It does the job that is required without the need of a bunch of additonal bloat that is never used. I find it to be the best tester on the market.
Read full review
PingPlotter has better visualizations and a stronger ability to capture historical data than other tools I've used. This makes it easier to find the root cause by looking back in the log data to find where latency or packet loss occurred.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Saves time which saves money
  • Allows for us to identify where issues are quickly and who the issue belongs too.
  • Testing cables has been much easier.
Read full review
  • Great ROI, troubleshooting time has been reduced by 90%
  • Network Discoveries used to take 2 to 3 hours and were inconsistent - now it is a matter of minutes
  • lacks integration into our MSP toolkit, and we now use it as a stand alone product
Read full review
ScreenShots

PingPlotter Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of