AirMagnet Spectrum XT vs. LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AirMagnet Spectrum XT
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
AirMagnet Spectrum XT is network troubleshooting technology, developed by Seattle-based Fluke Networks, acquired by NETSCOUT, then divested in 2018 and now supported by netAlly.N/A
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester offers user-configured AutoTests for a wide range of tasks. This network tester’s cable test and switch identification facilitate problem isolation. The device is supported by netAlly after NETSCOUT divested its handheld troubleshooting devices in 2018. The LinkRunner device replaces the former and now obsolete OneTouch AT network troubleshooting technology acquired from Seattle-based Fluke Networks by NETSCOUT in 2015.N/A
Pricing
AirMagnet Spectrum XTLinkRunner AT Network AutoTester
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AirMagnet Spectrum XTLinkRunner AT Network AutoTester
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AirMagnet Spectrum XTLinkRunner AT Network AutoTester
Best Alternatives
AirMagnet Spectrum XTLinkRunner AT Network AutoTester
Small Businesses
Auvik
Auvik
Score 9.9 out of 10
Auvik
Auvik
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PingPlotter
PingPlotter
Score 9.3 out of 10
PingPlotter
PingPlotter
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
PingPlotter
PingPlotter
Score 9.3 out of 10
PingPlotter
PingPlotter
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AirMagnet Spectrum XTLinkRunner AT Network AutoTester
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AirMagnet Spectrum XTLinkRunner AT Network AutoTester
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
All network administrators would be able to find a use for this tool in their environment. It allows people from outside of the networking industry to capture data required for a quick diagnosis. Things that typically would require me to be onsite for diagnosis can now be handed to Tier 1 techs for data collection and reporting. Since moving toward cable certification, we've experienced an almost unbelievably low level of cable failure. When it does happen, though, there is no guessing. Our Fluke units tell us what the problem is and where.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Identify the exact switchport a given line is plugged in to.
  • View the length and viability of any category or fiber optic cable.
  • It acts as a premade packet capture device, simple enough to walk someone through deploying while I'm offsite.
  • In the event LLDP based identification of a port fails, it has the ability to blink a switchport allowing for manual identification.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • It could be updated for Mgig or 10Gb.
  • Some devices should have SFP+ modules capabilities
  • Could be combined with other tools
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The network tester is one of the easest devices I have ever used. It does have capabilities that other testers simply don't have. Being able to identify the switch port it is plugged into, the address of the switch, the switch name, along with the VLAN has helped on so many occasions
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I feel that the LinkRunner autotester is just a simple device with an extremely easy to use and understand interface. It does the job that is required without the need of a bunch of additonal bloat that is never used. I find it to be the best tester on the market.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Saves time which saves money
  • Allows for us to identify where issues are quickly and who the issue belongs too.
  • Testing cables has been much easier.
Read full review
ScreenShots