TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Neo4j

    Score9.8 out of 10
    N/ANeo4j is an open source embeddable graph database developed by Neo Technologies based in San Mateo, California with an office in Sweden.

    $65

    per month

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/APercona Server for MongoDB is a free and open-source drop-in replacement for MongoDB Community Edition. It combines all the features and benefits of MongoDB Community Edition with enterprise-class features from Percona. Built on the MongoDB Community Edition, Percona Server for MongoDB provides flexible data structure, native high availability, easy scalability, and developer-friendly syntax. It also includes an in-memory engine, hot backups, LDAP authentication, database auditing, and log…N/A
    Pricing
    Neo4jPercona Server for MongoDB
    Editions & Modules
    Aura Professional
    $65
    per month
    Community Edition
    Free
    Enterprise Edition
    Contact Sales
    Aura Free
    Free
    Aura Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Neo4jPercona Server for MongoDB
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—Free and open-source
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Neo4jPercona Server for MongoDB
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Neo4j
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Neo4j
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Neo4j
    Score9.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Neo4jPercona Server for MongoDB
    Likelihood to Recommend
    2.1
    (9 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Neo4jPercona Server for MongoDB
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Neo Technologies
    Neo4J is great for creating network graphs or illustrating how things are related. It is also good for finding individuals or things that have greater influence than others in a system. It is not appropriate if you have standard data sets that can be analyzed using conventional methods or visualized using Tableau, for example.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Percona
    It offers good support for the implementation of solutions in the public and on-premises cloud and integration with other services such as Hashicorp Vault for data encryption. One of the main advantages is the ease of configuration, in addition to offering transaction support for the different operations and scalability of the servers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Neo Technologies
    • Mature Query language, I found Cypher QL to be mature in handling all sorts of problems we throw at it. Its expressive enough to be intuitive while providing rich features for various scenarios.
    • Native support for REST API, that makes interacting with Neo4J intuitive and easy.
    • Support for Procedures in Java, procedures are custom code that could be added to the Neo4J to write custom querying of data. The best part about the procedures is it could be invoked using the REST API. This allows us to overcome any shortcomings from their Cypher query language.
    • Nice UI and interface for executing the Query and visualizing the response.
    • UI access controlled by User credentials allows for neat access controls.
    • Awesome free community edition for small-scale projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Percona
    • High performance
    • Integration with other tools and services
    • Big data projects oriented
    • High availability and scalability
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Neo Technologies
    • One of the hardest challenges that Neo4j had to solve was the horizontal scaling problem. I am not updated on recent developments, but at the time of my use, I couldn't find a viable solution.
    • Neo4j does not play with other open source APIs like Blueprint. You have to use the native Neo4j API.
    • There wasn't a visual tool to see your data. Of course, third party tools are always available, but I would have loved something which came with the Neo4j bundle. I love that Docker comes bundled with Kitematic, so it's not wrong to hope that Neo4j could also ship with some default visualization software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Percona
    • The learning curve makes it a bit tricky to use at first.
    • Documentation is an aspect to improve, especially for people who are just starting out.
    • At the interface level, the user experience could be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Neo Technologies
    [Based on] Query Language, Performance on small and large data sets, integration and deployment, analysis, API support, Interactive UI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Percona
    One aspect to improve is the user experience since sometimes the steps to take are not clear and the user may need to review some of the actions before continuing with the next ones. Another aspect to improve is the documentation and support for developers who want to know the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Neo Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Percona
    It offers good support for the implementation of solutions in the public and on-premises cloud and integration with other services such as Hashicorp Vault for data encryption. Also, it offers support for different compatible programming languages such as C, C ++, Java, as well as offering good support for the persistence of schema-free data and the possibility of saving data in memory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Neo Technologies
    Neo4j is a graph store and has different use cases compared to another NoSQL Document store like MongoDB. MongoDB is a bad choice when joins are common as existing operators for joining two documents (similar to tables in a relational store) as Mongo 3.5 use SQL like join algorithms which are expensive. MongoDB is a great choice when distributed schemaless rich document structures are important requirements. Cross document transaction support is not native to MongoDB yet, whereas Neo4J is ACID complaint with all its operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Percona
    At the performance level, it is similar to other solutions such as MongoDB and Percona Server for MySQL. and at the customization level, it offers better support for the development of specific solutions that seek good performance in transactions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Neo Technologies
    • Positive: Less complex queries on graph structures, than in relational databases.
    • Negative: maintenance is a huge deal, things doesn't work and break, requiring lengthy restore operations.
    Read full review
    Percona
    • It offers a good alternative solution compared with other open source databases.
    • We have many resources at the documentation level and other tools that help the integration with different programming languages.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Percona Server for MongoDB Screenshots

    Screenshot of Percona Server for MongoDBScreenshot of Enterprise-Grade Features for FreeScreenshot of Percona Server for MongoDB Features