NameScan vs. Tungsten FraudOne

It has advance automated tool which leverage machine learning to deliver an expansive range of information retrieval , showing accurate result with good speeds. It is tool to tack the to the footprints of each & every entity available in the internet . Some time we get the information which come with false positive but after dong some fine-tuning information will get corrected.

Incentivized

• Single Dashboard Solution for all Quires
• Easy Integration with System
• Competitive Price

Incentivized

• The software still generates confusion, especially in the case of Asian names, often repetitive or similar to each other. In this case, the information it returns is not very accurate.
• The numerous integrative databases that can be purchased are really very expensive.
• NameScan is graphically unintuitive.

Incentivized

Based on the information from other university colleagues, it seems that NameScan is a more reliable and complete software than others of the same category. However, as already mentioned in another answer, the software NameScan remains a little weak in verifying the identity of people from states where names are frequently repeated.

Incentivized

• It allowed us to limit the admission of non-welcome people to the University.
• It has allowed us to limit the number of frauds in the context of thesis discussions, especially doctoral ones.
• NameScan has become fundamental in our university's internalisation to verify, in particular, people arriving from countries at risk.

Incentivized