Nagios provides monitoring of all mission-critical infrastructure components. Multiple APIs and community-build add-ons enable integration and monitoring with in-house and third-party applications for optimized scaling.
N/A
Vercara UltraWPM
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Vercara UltraWPM (formerly Neustar Web Performance Management, based on Webmetrics) is used to find and fix problems that impact connected customers: unavailable websites, slow-loading pages, and failing applications.
N/A
Pricing
Nagios Core
Vercara UltraWPM
Editions & Modules
Single License
Free
Single License
Free
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Nagios Core
Vercara UltraWPM
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Nagios Core
Vercara UltraWPM
Features
Nagios Core
Vercara UltraWPM
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Nagios Core
-
Ratings
Vercara UltraWPM
7.5
Ratings
3% below category average
Remote monitoring
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Automated alerts and notifications
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Reporting
Comparison of Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Nagios Core
-
Ratings
Vercara UltraWPM
6.3
Ratings
19% below category average
Performance data reports
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Customizable reporting
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Data visualization
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Nagios is simply a very configurable and rock solid monitoring engine. For these reasons I would recommend it to any IT professional in any medium to large organization where creating custom checks and programming ones custom needs into the configuration is practical. I would be more hesitant to recommend it as a first monitoring solution for a small business which is usually accompanied by a less experienced and/or more time constrained admin.
If you need to gauge whether your site is up or down, then Neustar will give you exactly what you are looking for. However, if you need more granularity for specific application or sub-systems and their functionality, this product will need to be subsidized with other applications that provide more data or information on how individual components or systems are working.
It's built by engineers for engineers so setting it up and configuring it is relatively complicated. It could really use a simplified configuration approach, or a GUI to set it up instead of editing config files.
I'd like to see the option to have service notification settings inherited from the host setting notifications. They have to be set up separately but they are often the same, so it would be nice to have less redundancy.
We're currently looking to combine a bunch of our network montioring solutions into a single platform. Running multiple unique solutions for monitoring, data collection, compliance reporting etc has become a lot to manage.
The Nagios UI is in need of a complete overhaul. Nice graphics and trendy fonts are easy on the eyes, but the menu system is dated, the lack of built in graphing support is confusing, and the learning curve for a new user is too steep.
I haven't had to use support very often, but when I have, it has been effective in helping to accomplish our goals. Since Nagios has been very popular for a long time, there is also a very large user base from which to learn from and help you get your questions answered.
We have tested several other monitoring products which were able to monitor the basic matrix (Memory, DiskUsage, CPU%, UpTime, Running Service Status, Port 80 Up/Down). Although some offered far better UIs, they lacked the ability to monitor ANYTHING. Zabbix, being the only contender worthy of competing, is a good alternative to Nagios. We also tried Zenoss Core & OpenNMS which were good enough for non-Linux engineers to get started with. OP5 was another service-oriented monitoring solution we evaluated. Apart from Nagios, Consul is heavily used to monitor & register the micro-service systems & end-point URLs. Due to the time invested (9+years) in Nagios, we were able to get more components installed/configured easily than alternatives.
To be honest, I am not certain why this product was initially chosen over other products. It was being used when I started working at a new job. I was trained on its use and focused on tracking issues when an alert was given. There are many products that can be used for monitoring site uptime. Neustar definitely has its uses for monitoring if a site is up or down, but its lack of granularity can turn some away.
With it being a free tool, there is no cost associated with it, so it's very valuable to an organization to get something that is so great and widely used for free.
You can set up as many alerts as you want without incurring any fees.
Our company at one time gauged overall system uptime using Neustar WebMetrics to provide this data
Due to the limitations with the applications ability to show system functionality and uptime we have begun using other methods for determining system uptime for our customers.
The interface can be a bit tricky to understand during first use. There is somewhat of a learning curve.