myStaffingPro is a web-based applicant tracking system (ATS) that offers applicant tracking, candidate recruiting, and onboarding in a scalable, configurable solution. It is a SaaS model makes it accessible from anywhere at any time, and offers unlimited integration capabilities. Some key features include: Social Recruiting, Interview Scheduling and Tracking, and Resume and Social Media Parsing.
N/A
Pricing
myStaffingPro
Editions & Modules
myStaffingPro Express
$0
Per User per Month
myStaffingPro
$0
Per User per Month
myStaffingPro Premier
$0
Per User per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
myStaffingPro
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Additional Details
Pricing is based on the number of users and configuration selected.
HRIS Systems Administrator in Information Technology at KellyOCG-RPO (Outsourcing/Offshoring, 1001-5000 employees)
Chose myStaffingPro
We have evaluated over the years many, many Applicant Tracking systems. Taleo, PeopleSoft etc. While Taleo is the Cadillac of ATS's, they are expensive and time consuming to setup and are less willing to work with customers customization needs. Peoplesoft was the closest runner …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose myStaffingPro
I have also used PeopleSoft/Link which is a product that I much prefer to MyStaffingPro, however I was not here when we selected MyStaffingPro so therefor was not part of the decision making. I know though, we selected MyStaffingPro due to the price. From the version/module …
Human Resources Assistant in Human Resources at Armanino LLP (Non-Profit Organization Management, 501-1000 employees)
Chose myStaffingPro
We thought it would've been better than ADP, but it wasn't. Also, the sales person who sold us on Paychex promised that this and Paychex would be able to do a lot of things we needed, which turned out to be a lie when we were implementing it, and the MyStaffingPro expert told …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose myStaffingPro
I feel MSP is much easier to use than the other ATS systems I've dealt with - it's user-friendly, easy to figure out and is great at putting all the relevant information in one place. It's easy access to all candidate files or requisition files. You do not waste time searching …
Lead Business Analyst in Information Technology at CGI (Information Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees)
Chose myStaffingPro
Our Organization needed limited features and functionality and not full-blown application for Staffing. myStaffingPro was the perfect suite for our requirement as pricing was the distinguishing factor. We evaluated the product for the features and value for money proposition. …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Recruiting Manager in Manufacturing at Weatherford (Oil & Energy, 10,001+ employees)
Chose myStaffingPro
I have used a number of different ATSs in the last eight years and Taleo has been the best from a company wide standpoint. myStaffingPro is good for recruiting but lacks the ability to be a company wide tool. Also, being from an Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO) setting it …
Verified User
Chose myStaffingPro
Taleo compared to myStaffingpro definately fits better for high volume recruiting and user use. It has a cleaner look, but all in all does the same function as myStaffingPro when you are able to have all modules from posting, to hiring, to onboarding.
Verified User
Chose myStaffingPro
I wasn't part of the selection process of myStaffingPro it was already implemented by my client. However in terms of an ATS it has all the necessary functions to be a useful ATS. There are more intuitive programs such as Taleo that can be easily modified by the …
Key User Insights
Would buy again
No answers on this topic
Delivers good value for the price
No answers on this topic
Happy with the feature set
No answers on this topic
Lived up to sales and marketing promises
No answers on this topic
Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic
Features
myStaffingPro
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of myStaffingPro
myStaffingPro is very easy to configure and setup and takes less than 2 business days to configure and get it up and running. It facilitates the HR Business Partners in their recruitment activities. For the Open Position in the Organization, with the use of the software, they can quickly shortlist the candidates with quick mix and match of the requirements. Interviews can be scheduled with the candidate. If a Candidate is selected, the proper background screening process is initiated and finally, the Onboarding process is also tightly integrated within the software.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
They are good about scheduling maintenance during overnight periods. There have been a few server issues with the e-signature system over the weekends.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We thought it would've been better than ADP, but it wasn't. Also, the sales person who sold us on Paychex promised that this and Paychex would be able to do a lot of things we needed, which turned out to be a lie when we were implementing it, and the MyStaffingPro expert told us it wasn't possible, and it never was. It wasn't as user friendly either.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
