MUGA is a web-based video conferencing system built to deliver a real-time communication and collaboration experience. In an era of rapid digitization, globalization of businesses, and geographically dispersed teams, the need for dynamic online meeting solutions has been on the rise. In response to the growing demand, the vendor states they have built MUGA as an all-inclusive virtual conferencing platform for seamless communication, effective collaboration, and better remote workforce…
$5.35
per user
Skype for Business / Lync (discontinued)
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Skype for Business was an online messaging and conferencing tool, now superseded by Microsoft Teams.
N/A
Pricing
MUGA
Skype for Business / Lync (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Monthly ( India )
$5.35
per user
Yearly ( India )
$57.82
per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MUGA
Skype for Business / Lync (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$5.35 per user
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MUGA
Skype for Business / Lync (discontinued)
Features
MUGA
Skype for Business / Lync (discontinued)
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
MUGA
6.8
Ratings
16% below category average
Skype for Business / Lync (discontinued)
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
High quality audio
8.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
High quality video
8.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements
7.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Mobile support
4.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
MUGA
6.5
Ratings
20% below category average
Skype for Business / Lync (discontinued)
7.0
Ratings
12% below category average
Desktop sharing
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Whiteboards
6.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
MUGA
7.3
Ratings
13% below category average
Skype for Business / Lync (discontinued)
9.3
Ratings
12% above category average
Calendar integration
7.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Meeting initiation
7.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Record meetings / events
9.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Slideshows
6.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Integrates with social media
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
MUGA
7.0
Ratings
15% below category average
Skype for Business / Lync (discontinued)
7.5
Ratings
9% below category average
Live chat
8.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Q&A
6.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Audience polling
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
MUGA
10.0
Ratings
21% above category average
Skype for Business / Lync (discontinued)
6.8
Ratings
18% below category average
User authentication
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions
10.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Confidential attendee list
10.00 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
It is great for international use. It has good features, and the security is above and beyond. The service level if I/we have a problem could be better as their customer service is not quick to respond, but other than the occasional glitch, it is the best platform we have experienced and much better than MS Teams. Ease of use - easy set up for new employees inside the co and out.
Skype is useful for collaborations across distances, including work from home, as well as a more convenient way to communicate with a large group of people. Skype is also useful to communicate with specific parties quickly, rather than relying on cellular service in areas where not as available. Skype is less useful if the team does not use computers , tablets, smartphones, etc in daily workflow as it would rarely be used.
Probably the biggest area is the video element as it has historically struggled in this area.
The need to be forced to federate with another organisation by providing yours and enabling the other organisation settings is a bit tedious but once done, allows for simple collaboration between third-parties.
Functionality wise, as it's an older product and being superseded by MS Teams, it feels as if it's run its course but was very good for what it does/did at the time.
I honestly feel that with most people using iPhone nowadays, it's easy to just call or use FaceTime if you need to be in touch with a client. Unless you need to have a conference call, there are plenty of ways to get in touch with a client otherwise besides using a somewhat inefficient program.
Easy to use and very few complaints. But the usability on the front end was not easy as we had difficult setting up the contract and thus the first call. Timing was urgent and it took too long to get a rep to call us back and that put us in a bind and we had to use another web product
Very easy to use. Even though Microsoft Teams has a lot of features and integrations, as a user I feel completely comfortable on finding what I need, getting information about the app extensions and using them. It's a very comprehensive tool, intuitive design and does not make me feel tired to be using it. I am glad with the current experience.
We have tried to reach out a few times and the cust service dept was inept. Slow to get to and when we did get through they were not bright folks. Thankfully we haven't had to call them often. But it is a security and long term concern that as we expand our need, will they be there for us? That is a remaining question. A
I have only had to reach out to the Support team at Skype for Business once with an issue, and I was pleasantly surprised and encouraged by the quickness and thoroughness of their response. The wait time was short and my question was dealt with politely and clearly, so I would say the support team has it together.
Skpe for business is utilized company wide in regards to my company. Everyone not only uses it, but uses it often. It is an effective way of communicating. It also integrates very nicely with outlook and all conversation history is pushed to a folder within the outlook system. We also have it so that if someone misses a message, they are sent an email reminder saying that there is a message that went unread.
No comparison. MUGA was the best solution and the best technology. It was an easy decision. The biggest challenge was getting a contract and securing ourselves as a customer to get the very first video set up and to get a call back on a few insurance/cyber security questions answered before we had our first official call.
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams is just better for us since we were already a Microsoft productivity suite (Office) user. No additional cost when we went from traditional product license model to SaaS. Continuous integration and upgrades with MS 365 make it even easier to use and therefore stickier.
In the move to WFH for the over 90000 employees of the firm in 13 different timezones, Skype for [Business], as the primary communication tool has been the most critical factor in ensuring there's not a communication breakdown.
An average of 7 calls a day and around 50-60 text messages are sent via Skype for [Business]. These communications are critical for [the] continued delivery of our services.
Video/voice calling and screen sharing features of Skype have played a great role in simulating a shared workspace scenario in the virtual mode as best as possible.