mRemoteNG is a fork of mRemote, an open source, tabbed, multi-protocol, remote connections manager.
N/A
N-able Take Control
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
N-able™ Take Control is a cloud-based remote control solution for MSPs, to access & troubleshoot end devices. With support for Windows®, Mac®, and Linux® machines, MSPs can work from these or iOS® or Android® devices with the N-able native app.
$45
per month
Pricing
mRemoteNG
N-able Take Control
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Take Control Plus
$45
per month
Take Control Plus
Contact Vendor
Take Control
Contact Vendor
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
mRemoteNG
N-able Take Control
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
No credit card required. Login info sent directly to your email. Access technical support during your trial.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
mRemoteNG
N-able Take Control
Features
mRemoteNG
N-able Take Control
Remote Administration
Comparison of Remote Administration features of Product A and Product B
mRemoteNG
7.9
Ratings
3% below category average
N-able Take Control
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
Screen sharing
8.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
File transfer
5.10 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Over-the-Internet remote session
9.00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Remote management of servers & workstations
10.00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Remote Active Directory® management
9.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Centralized management dashboard
8.10 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Annotations
7.00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Monitoring and Alerts
9.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Multi-platform remote control
5.60 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Instant message
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Secure remote access with Smart Card authentication
mRemote is well suited if you need to manage multiple types of servers and/or network devices. Instead of opening a dedicated Putty session and having to manage all of the windows, mRemote can handle all of this with different tabs. If you only have a few devices (less than 10), mRemote could be overwhelming for the need and not quite match up with what you are needing.
It is phenomenal as a remote service tool, as well as a Teamviewer alternative for end users. But its per device interface is lacking, as well as how technicians are set-up. Once you learn the ins and outs its quite easy to use from both sides. However, it can be a little quirky when initially set-up.
Tabbed Views. Each server remote desktop is viewed in its own separate tab, similar to a web browser. This makes it much quicker and easier to switch between them than using separate windows.
Storing credentials. You can configure it with log on credentials for each system, saving time on accessing as you don't need to enter a password each time.
Multiple connection types. I use the traditional RDP the most, but mRemoteNG allows many different connection types, similar to Putty.
Take Control is really good at accessing a device with no end-user involvement. The user doesn't have to click on permissions or visit a particular site. We simply can take control of their device from the RMM dashboard.
If Microsoft issues a patch/update, I can schedule a release of a mass install to all client sites at the click of a mouse from within my office.
It's very easy to setup and use. The tree structure organizes the multiple connections in a hierarchical manner which makes it easy to browse and the tabbed browsing make it simple to switch between multiple ongoing connections You can even export the list of connections and import it to another setup.
mRemoteNG is far more useful than LogMeIn when on the same network, or VPN as the servers, as it allows multiple server screens open in multiple tabs. LogMeIn is much more useful when working out of the office for its ability to connect anywhere, but each system accessed is in a separate window making navigation a little tricky. Sometimes I use them in tandem however, LogMeIn to access a machine in my network, then mRemoteNG to access multiple machines from there!
Bad experiences with ConnectWise platforms in general ruled it out for us at this point in time. To be fair this was not really ConnectWise's fault more the team that set things up poorly leading to significant issues across the system. TeamViewer had long been our go to, but pricing increases, the inclusion of ads (in a not inexpensive product) is infuriating for some. and ongoing poor business behavior reports in the industry lead us to look elsewhere