MOZARK vs. ReadyAPI

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MOZARK
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
MOZARK is an App Experience Testing Platform that lets users perform integrated experience, functional, and performance testing. The solution helps users build apps that engage your customers and drive revenue. The platform is powered by following products: App Experience: Even small lags in an app can lead to abandonments. Users can monitor an app’s performance in real-time to detect and fix customer issues pro-actively. App…N/A
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro) is a REST and SOAP API functional testing tool that enables software developers, QA engineers, and manual testers to work together to create, maintain, and execute complex end-to-end API tests in their CI/CD pipelines without needing to code.N/A
Pricing
MOZARKReadyAPI
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MOZARKReadyAPI
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MOZARKReadyAPI
Best Alternatives
MOZARKReadyAPI
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Oracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Oracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
SoapUI Open Source
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MOZARKReadyAPI
Likelihood to Recommend
6.5
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MOZARKReadyAPI
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for small-scale applications and freelance developers. It has in-built performance measuring criteria that give good insights about the application use. Overall it is good but it does need improvements in performance measuring metrics and more flexibility in reporting analytics for the application.
Read full review
As stated, we do a LOT of API testing, the swaggerhub import makes it easy to add APIs. This is very well-suited, as well as easy management of the steps/cases/suites inside of ReadyAPI. The one thing I do wish ReadyAPI was better suited for is changes to data, we have a lot of test cases in ReadyAPI and if we make a change to how the backend data is structured, one-by-one adjustments need to be made to the steps. Less appropriate, UI testing.
Read full review
Pros
  • 24/7 proactive monitoring for apps
  • Parallel execution of tests which in return helps to minimize the time for testing for different scenarios
  • Support for continuous deployment
  • In-depth analysis for performance of application based on different parameters
Read full review
  • SoapUI NG Pro is a prefect tool for setting up complicated test cases with many steps including parameterized Web Service requests, response assertions, data generators, data sources, data sinks (report recorders) and more
  • You can use Groovy or JavaScript for more complicated automation such as validating the results, extracting data, using external Java libraries or running system processes. Groovy IDE is compatible with Java and you can easily write your code in Java with very few modifications.
  • SoapUI enables you to run multiple test suites in parallel or in a loop, and provide user friendly reports including all test case results and test case coverage.
  • SoapUI NG Pro lets you to perform security test against your web services with predefined scenarios such as xml bombing, xml injection, sql injection, buffer overflow tests, monkey testing and so on.
  • SoapUI NG Pro, offers a simple but practical solution for low to medium load testing scenarios. You can obtain many more Load and Performance testing features by extending your license with purchasing LoadUI Pro.
Read full review
Cons
  • Only suitable for small sized applications
  • Dashboard and reporting can be improved and the option for user-defined metrics will be an added advantage. As of now, customizations for reports are limited.
Read full review
  • REST - They have come a long way, but there could still be improvements here. I find the learning curve much higher and not as straight forward using REST vs SOAP.
  • Composite Projects - I'd really like to see them implement something around saving/refreshing Test Suites when using the Composite project ability in Pro. This is currently an enhancement in feature backlog (see their forum for more details). Functionality around Projects and Test Cases seems pretty sound.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I would definitely renew the ReadyAPI as I was pretty happy while using it. But then I switched my job, and the current workplace is using Postman so we are using it for now. Plus, I don't have any issues with Postman. At the end of the day, it about selecting the tool that gets your work done more efficiently.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
SoapUI allows us to combine multiple tests and adhere
to the sequence that they need to run in order to complete successfully.
It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Soap UI has managed to continuously build on it's solid foundation and keep improving by each release. It is by far the most dependable and accurate testing tool out there of its kind. Available via connecting to VM's created as SoapUI test machines give access to it anytime, anywhere practically.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
For my purposes, the provided help features have been sufficient. I am sure I would be better off if I were to spend more time studying the app. For now, I load a project, connect, and execute. It just works.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
no very easy but lacks documentation
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I have not used other API testing products but I am completely satisfied with the functionality and performance of ReadyAPI. It covers all required API protocols and database connections that are used in our organization. It also allows extending the functionality by adding external DB drivers and wiring custom scripts when the native assertion/data manipulation test steps are not sufficient.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing. However, I have read that added monitoring tools have been added, which if so the 7 could possibly go to a 8 or 9.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Easy to use interface
  • Does not require in-depth training or knowledge to start and work with the tool
Read full review
  • We were able to achieve our needs in API test automation with the tool
  • In terms ROI, I would say that we have gotten what is basically needed
  • Though the initial setup was tough, after that we were able to continue it with user friendly UI and reporting.
  • Overall, it had [a] neutral impact in terms [of] ROI.
Read full review
ScreenShots

MOZARK Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of