monday dev is a collaboration tool for development teams from Monday.com
N/A
productboard
Score 6.5 out of 10
N/A
productboard, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is a product management system designed to help product managers understand what users need, prioritize what to build, and rally everyone around a roadmap.
$25
per month
Pricing
monday dev
productboard
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essential
$25.00
per month
Pro
$60.00
per month
Scale
$120.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
monday dev
productboard
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
monday dev
productboard
Features
monday dev
productboard
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
monday dev
8.6
Ratings
12% above category average
productboard
-
Ratings
Task Management
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
9.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
9.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
9.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
8.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
8.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
7.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Search
8.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
If you do web programming, code integration with your remote team, and/or software development that requires real-time monitoring of development progress, monday dev is an excellent tool for this. Like its base platform, Monday.com, monday dev is developed and attempts to integrate into a very "new era" organizational system of digital whiteboards, only now focused more on productivity and helping developers to be comfortable in remote work.
The best feature of productboard is organized features, it has a very simple structure and can be read and understood by anyone. If your roadmap is very dynamic and the executive team needs to be on top of it, productboard is the best application out there. But if you have a small product and features do not change very often, then maybe you can look at other alternatives since productboard is expensive.
While monday dev is an excellent ally to organize and work in harmony with your team, there are still certain important aspects that need to be improved. They are minor, but if corrected, they will help improve the user experience when using it.
Monday is better than Jobber, as it gives you a place to see where all the jobs are and what the current status is. Everyone in the company can go to and see that view. It's not dependent on the status of the employee. Excel is much more technical and requires much more work to set up.
I have previously used Aha another product road mapping/ insights driven software. Aha had great features for the userbase of my previous products. They were allowed to create their own suggestions for the products and other users could then like or dislike the suggestion. This created a real reflection on need for product enhancements. productboard handles this slightly differently. Each user creates their own suggestions and doesn't necessarily have visibility on other users suggestions. The product/ R&D team can then tag suggestions together into the same overall suggestion. This requires more input from product/R&D with productboard. I would however, suggest that productboard is better than Aha. Aha is great for an external user point of view; however, there may be case for users to not have visibility on wider user requirements. productboard keeps more of this element hidden and would perhaps stir up less negative correlation to seeing a system requirement/suggest having had a lot of traffic and no action, compared to a more closed system that would individually update each user on the enhancement progress.