Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Mimecast Mailbox Continuity

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is used to provide intelligent detection and control of sensitive information across Office 365, OneDrive, SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and on the endpoint. It also helps prevent data loss through identifying and preventing risky or inappropriate sharing, transfer, or use of sensitive data on endpoints, apps, and services.N/A
Mimecast Mailbox Continuity
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Mimecast’s Mailbox Continuity solution eliminates the impact of primary email system downtime, with admin controlled alerts, monitoring and response to mail disruption. The solution provides monitoring of inbound and outbound email flow to determine outages and alert server issues. The service provides automated alerts with one click continuity activation and employee notification. Combined with Mimecast Email Security, it is designed to ensure full security control even during an email outage.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionMimecast Mailbox Continuity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionMimecast Mailbox Continuity
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionMimecast Mailbox Continuity
Features
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionMimecast Mailbox Continuity
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
8.5
Ratings
32% above category average
Mimecast Mailbox Continuity
-
Ratings
Data Encryption8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionMimecast Mailbox Continuity
Small Businesses
Paubox Email Suite
Paubox Email Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Paubox Email Suite
Paubox Email Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionMimecast Mailbox Continuity
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionMimecast Mailbox Continuity
Likelihood to Recommend
I would highly recommend Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention for companies that are utilizing Microsoft technologies based on the strong integrations. If a company is using other technologies (e.g Google Workspace), then Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention would not be a good fit and would be difficult to implement/manage.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • It's a great product from an information protection perspective, as it can identify different types of data across tons of different locations.
  • It's great at applying standard regulatory frameworks, like HIPAA, to management actions so you can work towards being as compliant as possible.
  • The eDiscovery tools are very helpful when it comes to managing legal holds and discovery requests, as it's simple to freeze accounts or hold at points in time for discovery.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Advanced or specific policies have a high learning curve.
  • We have to rely on our reseller partner to implement some of the policies that we were looking for.
  • Microsoft is constantly trying to upsell the PureView suite and hides some features included in E5 Enterprise to try and upsell.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is super difficult.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Symantec or now? Brocom. Forcepoint, GPV. I'm trying to think of, there's a couple more. I can't think of the top of my head. I would say closer to the bottom then rather than the top. So because of the fact that yes, it integrates well. But in terms of the actual functionality of DLP, there are other requirements that they just don't have the features for yet.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • I think it's integral to everything, it has to be positive and the positivity has to be the ability to use Purview in a situation for an organization. For us as a provider, we're not sure if we need your services or we think we're doing this thing correctly. We also evaluate compliance team. So first thing that we may do is if we don't have a footprint in the organization and we don't know what their data parameter or their data flow capabilities are, if we don't think that they're controlling it confidently, we validate and verify. We may do a content search and that content search immediately will be the most revealing thing. They'll be like, "alright, so right here on this diagram, this and this area are the areas that you have protected that are capable of protecting CUI. How come your CUIs in all of these 18 other different areas in which you see as like scope creep happens because the enforcement mechanisms haven't been tested, validated or whatever, or haven't been effective." It allows us to do quick cleanup, quick discovery, and things like that for new onboarding clients.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Screenshots

Screenshot of pre-built policy templates to easily get startedScreenshot of DLP analytics to help recommend new policies and fine tune existing onesScreenshot of the step that enables one policy to be applied to several locationsScreenshot of then next step, that enables policies to be scoped to specific users and user groupsScreenshot of composite conditions using groups of AND /OR and exceptions with NOTScreenshot of granular restrictions for different actions