TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs. SAP Access Control

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Entra ID Governance

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Entra ID Governance (formerly Azure AD Security Governance) is an IT security platform which will secure users, govern access with intelligent policies, continuously monitor threats, and take appropriate action.N/A

    SAP Access Control

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/ASAP Access control streamlines the process of managing and validating user access to applications and data with minimal support from IT, with the goal of giving employees the applications and services they need without exposing data and processes to unauthorized use.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft Entra ID GovernanceSAP Access Control
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Entra ID GovernanceSAP Access Control
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing quotes based on the Pricing Calculator.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft Entra ID GovernanceSAP Access Control
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    SAP
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    13 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    83%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft Entra ID GovernanceSAP Access Control
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    SAP Access Control
    Score7.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    SAP Access Control
    Score7.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Entra ID GovernanceSAP Access Control
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.9
    (16 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft Entra ID GovernanceSAP Access Control
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    For creating and managing Users in AD, Roles and groups assignment
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    Appropriate for SAP hrs hierarchy integration and can have multiple hierarchies of org structures adopted as alternative workflow support. Cons of access control are the logs of firefighter usage are still limited in depth and does not evolve to adop more cloud products which are coming at a plaster pace than the ac product as such.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Identity Management
    • Privilege management
    • Entitlement Management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • SAP Access Control ensures that our services are accessed by the right users since it send me alerts when an employee tries to access any application. That way, I am able to either authorize or cancel the request to safeguard of company data.
    • With SAP Access Control, it is easy to automate and monitor how our team access services and applications. SAP Access Control has an automatic feature that notifies me when employees access applications and services and the issues they are encountering.
    • In addition, SAP Access Control add security on employees login to ensure that their data on the applications are encrypted to never leak to cyber attackers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Workflow configuration
    • emergency admin elevation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • It still uses the webdynpro for the front end. All webdynpro applications should be migrated to Fiori for a better user experience.
    • Some functionalities can't manage in mass way. I.E. building derive roles/multiple single roles,
    • Interface with LDAP is not efficient.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    We are very happy with it.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    This is a great tool for a medium to large sized company. SAP Access Control requires a great deal of SAP knowledge to use, but it is certainly information that can be learned. Their customer support is wonderful and easy to work with. The overall usability is great. I greatly recommend this software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    This product fulfills all our requirements. We can use this for user management, role management, risk analysis, business role management, workflow management. Initial configuration takes a lot of effort. Otherwise it's a great product for the end user. SAP Access Control tool performance needs improvement, sometimes it slows down the processing time for requests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    The main reason to select the Azure AD Security Governance is that it helps us to achieve and have great security governance on the entire organization Structure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    Pricing was higher for the cloud version of the BTP service - IAG. SAP Access Control pretty much facilitates everything we are looking for as an enterprise with an efficient dollar cost ROI for the services we are looking for. Also, there were many features on the cloud version which came bundled with the license and we had to pay for them even though we did not actually use these products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Azure AD Security Governance Users and roles
    • Active directory groups to reduce the security issues
    • Increased redundancy
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Reducing risk of fraud. Implementing SAP Access Control allows analysis of every role assigned to a job on the organization. Through this analysis, weakness on roles are detected, corrected and monitored. As the users feel the change, they also feel that they are being monitored, preventing any intent to use his position and privileges to take personal advantage. So a major impact to organizations is to reduce the financial lost due to frauds.
    • Reducing cost for monitoring. Another positive impact is lowering the cost of monitoring. This is twofold: First, a rather small team can manage access management. Second, through the use of SAP Access Control the complete universe of roles and users can be monitored without increasing the cost for the continuous monitoring.
    • During transactions. The use of SAP Access Controls allows detection of transactions that, from an information security point of view, require some redesign. When SAP GCR is implemented, you make some discoveries such as: obsolete transactions, transactions with no authorization objects and the like. The transactions with these problems can be left out of the active roles, waiting for remediation of the issues found.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots