TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Entra External ID vs. Oracle Identity Governance

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Entra External ID

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Entra External ID (formerly Azure Active Directory B2C, or alternately, Azure Active Directory External Identities) provides business-to-customer identity as a service. Customers can use their preferred social, enterprise, or local account identities to get single sign-on access to applications and APIs.

    $0

    per month per active users

    Oracle Identity Governance

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AOracle Identity Governance (OIG) -formerly Oracle Identity Manager or OIM- is an enterprise identity management system that automatically manages users' access privileges within enterprise IT resources.

    $3,600

    Pricing
    Microsoft Entra External IDOracle Identity Governance
    Editions & Modules
    Premium P1 (for More than 50,000 MAU)
    $0.00325
    per month per active users
    Premium P2 (for More than 50,000 MAU)
    $0.01625
    per month per active users
    Processor - Minimum
    $1
    Named User Plus - Software Update License & Support
    $792
    Named User Plus - Price
    $3,600
    Processor - Software Update License & Support
    39,600.00
    Processor - Price
    180,000
    Named User Plus - Minimum
    N/A
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Entra External IDOracle Identity Governance
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsA flat fee of $0.03 is billed for each SMS/Phone-based multi-factor authentication attempt.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft Entra External IDOracle Identity Governance
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Oracle
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Microsoft Entra External IDOracle Identity Governance
    Identity Management
    Comparison of Identity Management features of Microsoft Entra External ID and Oracle Identity Governance
    Feature
    Microsoft Entra External ID
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Identity Governance
    5.6
    2 Ratings
    36% below category average
    ID-Management Access Control00 Ratings6.62 Ratings
    ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)00 Ratings6.12 Ratings
    Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings3.02 Ratings
    Password Management00 Ratings7.32 Ratings
    Account Provisioning and De-provisioning00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    ID Management Workflow Automation00 Ratings4.62 Ratings
    ID Risk Management00 Ratings2.32 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft Entra External IDOracle Identity Governance
    Small Businesses
    JumpCloud
    Score8.4 out of 10
    JumpCloud
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    OneLogin by One Identity
    Score9.6 out of 10
    OneLogin by One Identity
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Entra External IDOracle Identity Governance
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (6 ratings)
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft Entra External IDOracle Identity Governance
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    It is not easy to calculate the actual ROI due to the difficult quantification of all factors, but it certainly contributed a lot in protecting, monitoring and controlling access to our system. It also made it much easier to detect vulnerable external users with simple and "easy to hack" passwords they use on multiple apps.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Well suited for: 1. Large and medium organisations who have the capacity to invest in IAM roadmap for long term. 2. Organisations with and existing oracle and partner applications ecosystem. 3. Scenario where the user base is on the higher side and organisations looking to scale up in near future. 4. Organisation with complex workflow need in identity management process. Not well suited for 1. Small organisations or even medium ones which have a lesser number of applications 2. Scenarios where custom connectors need to be developed but at the same time turnaround should be quick. 3. Scenarios when features you are looking for are missing, getting them added could take a lot of effort. 4. UI is not very user-friendly and needs to be customised. 5. Takes time to stablise post going live
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • One of the things that Microsoft Entra External ID does really well is creating user logins, accounts and profile. It is very easy to create them, manage them and delete them. It is fast and reliant.
    • Limit access or authorization feature. We can allow different levels of authorization and access. So that not all the employees would have access to all the data. Only some relaible employees would have access and power to change anything.
    • Mutli factor authentication feature is also a really good feature to secure data. Even overseas vendors need MFS to login which gives double protection to our data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • It has a very well-defined and scalable framework (LDAP directory).
    • It scales particularly well, going from a basic platform to a complex one using customisation and extensions.
    • It integrates well with other components like SSO and Access Manager to provide comprehensive a one stop identity management solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Troubleshooting diagnostic logs effectively requires VS Code
    • Group and role management requires additional effort
    • The programming model (XML) could use some developer experience love
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • The cost could be lower.
    • Support.
    • Identity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    I find it easy to use. The usability is great. Every department uses it for different purposes. Everyone access information relevant to them. Since we've started to use this we have seen less security incidents.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Overall good product and somewhat reliable when used in a specific manner. However, there are cons like unending bugs and no well-defined upgrade path. The product could have been more flexible and lite in terms of organisational infra needs. OIM is a robust product but other vendors are almost on-par now.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    I really enjoy how simple it is to connect this Active Directory with other Microsoft Products to collaborate with colleagues and clients.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    I was not involved in the purchasing decision, an enterprise architect who used Gartner as a source was influential
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Having monthly active users billing was cost-effective.
    • Helped with the IT support that was already managing the Azure platform of the company; this helped to manage the costs better and optimize them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • It has a great impact from moving us from paper based to full EHR Compliance
    • It's easy to check and see how users get and lose access to the systems that are administered through OIM
    • It's also helping in tying down Policies and procedures within the Orgainization
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots