Microsoft Dynamics SL vs. Oracle PeopleSoft ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score 5.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's PeopleSoft ERP (or PeopleSoft FSCM) is a software solution used to reduce costs by automating and centralizing global transactional processes and the enterprise entire supply chain. Oracle states they have extended support for PeopleSoft to 2034.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Features
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
Ratings
17% above category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.2
Ratings
15% below category average
Pay calculation9.60 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files9.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.4
Ratings
17% below category average
API for custom integration6.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Plug-ins6.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.3
Ratings
11% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.9
Ratings
8% above category average
Single sign-on capability7.40 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.30 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.8
Ratings
6% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
5.9
Ratings
20% below category average
Dashboards7.10 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Standard reports7.10 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Custom reports6.10 Ratings4.80 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.2
Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable7.60 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.60 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.40 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.30 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.3
Ratings
59% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.0
Ratings
27% below category average
Inventory tracking6.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Location management1.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
Pricing6.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order entry6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.8
Ratings
25% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.7
Ratings
3% above category average
Billing Management6.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management5.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.30 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Period Close7.40 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
Ratings
47% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.4
Ratings
3% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting7.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Project Costing6.30 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Cost Capture2.10 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Capital Project Management8.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.3
Ratings
23% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management6.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
21% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.7
Ratings
16% above category average
Production Management6.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Production Process Design00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
17% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.4
Ratings
4% above category average
Inventory Planning6.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.9
Ratings
1% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.5
Ratings
6% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
5.2
Ratings
23% below category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.0
Ratings
30% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.9
Ratings
22% above category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
6.6
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
1.8
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.5
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
1.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
In the service series, there is a weakness in applying revenue recognition concepts which are a strong point of the project series. It is difficult to get a period sensitive WIP that could be recreated at any time for a point in time (fiscal period).
Read full review
Well suited for established, large organizations with a large user base and the ability to devote significant resources to design and implementation of a vetted, long-term solution for business processing. Not well suited for very small businesses or businesses whose business processes are changing continuously. Changing PeopleSoft for business process changes/modifications requires significant time and resources due to the design, testing, and implementation tasks involved
Read full review
Pros
  • Ability to add companies, and sub-accounts on the fly allows for the growth of the system without conversions, and flexible reporting allows for the quick utilization of the data.
  • Multi-Company allows for easy and automated data entry and reporting across multiple legal entities and business segments.
  • Multi-Company also allows for easy centralization of business processes (AP check writing and Fixed Assets for example), while spreading data entry across the enterprise.
  • Ability to Copy/Paste into Dynamics SL has always been a strength- especially from Excel. The additional power of being able to use Excel for a myriad of calculations, including complex allocations, and formatting the result into a JE to paste directly into the Journal Entry Screen has saved countless hours in data-entry, and made re-use of complex items very easy.
Read full review
  • PeopleSoft has great development tools to help support the application. The application designer is a robust tool that provides the PeopleSoft Developer a powerful user interface to help support the PeopleSoft Financials application.
  • PeopleSoft Financials delivers robust financial reporting capabilities. With the use of nVision, queries, BI Publisher, and trees the Finance team can create all their reporting needs in an automated fashion.
  • PeopleSoft Financials has streamlined interfaces from the subsystems to the General Ledger. There is drill back capabilities from GL to the various subsystems to perform streamlined account reconciliations.
Read full review
Cons
  • When we have a lot of invoices rather than just a few large invoices, we can be frustrated by how long it takes Flexible Billings to generate a lot of invoices
  • It would be nice if Dynamics SL had an easy integration to some of the nicer salestax tools such as Avalara and CCH.
  • It would be nice if the fixed assets module and electronic banking were not third party.
Read full review
  • Inability to view the results of multiple queries at once in the Query Viewer.
  • Although there is excellent integration with Oracle's other products, there is an unacceptable amount of support for other third party vendors.
  • Personalization Feature for a Quick-Access Menu. Due to the abundance of features in PeopleSoft SCM, it sometimes takes a while to find that one option as there are so many others in the same menu. It would be nice for a user to be able to drag and drop some options they use frequently into a Quick-Access menu.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
Read full review
PRISM is a great tool to track and watch numerous financial documents. I would like to see more of an integration platform that would control tracking for specific project details. There is currently only a little section for job notes which I would like to see improve. I think navigation could be improved, but isn't the worst compared to some platforms I have worked with as it provides a tree like structure on the backend which helps synchronize information together for fiscal financials.
Read full review
Usability
SL itself is relatively easy to use and most of the Help Files documentation is well kept and outstanding in the amount of information that is given. Most end users pick up the functions quickly and are off and running after some limited training. There will always be questions and research to be done, but overall SL is relatively easy to follow for a seasoned user
Read full review
The usability is very outdated In my opinion. The screens resemble those of Windows 3.1. Too many clicks and drop-downs or clicks to go to a new screen. The business logic also appears dated and requires an update. Overall, it does not have a pleasing User Interface and should be refreshed, or a new interface should be built from the ground up.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Many times support will tell you that your issue is an identified bug and will be scheduled in the future to be fixed in a future release. The knowledgebase has gotten worse in recent years and much more difficult to use. many times you can't find the error during the search
Read full review
I can't give them a perfect rating because it does often take a long time and usually more [expensive] to resolve trying issues that cannot be solved by our in-house team. PeopleSoft is complicated, and the mix and match of user-created and stock modules cause problems very often. These usually require more customization to completely fix, requiring more money spent with
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
Read full review
I recommend that everyone pay special attention to developing a solid testing and training plan if you are even thinking of implementing PeopleSoft. Be ready to obtain good trainers and developers, otherwise, your journey can be unnecessarily painful and much more expensive. Try to stay with an implementation partner who really has your needs at heart, and actually takes the time to understand your organization!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew. We did try Great Plains and Peachtree (now Sage 50) and we discovered that they were rather complicated for our users. They were not as easy to maneuver and manipulate as SL and we felt that SL was much more "user friendly" and simplified, but still able to produce the same results.
Read full review
It is pretty much in line with PeopleSoft Financials because it gives seamless integration between Financials and HCM. Also, when you have both the softwares on same technology, it is very cost effective. One of the reason for selecting PeopleSoft Financials and HCM are their capability to customize the business process. We have gone so far that we have built the bolt-on solutions.
Read full review
Scalability
Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Dramatic improvement in our ability to judge the profitability of jobs.
  • Lots of improvements in delivering invoices and statements to customers.
  • Automated AP approvals and imaging made our last tax audit a breeze.
  • Ease of reporting data is a big plus. Financial statements with drill down capability are very useful.
  • One integrated system means less data moving around and more real time information.
  • EFT payments, email statements and live linked Excel charts have improved our efficency
  • Too many more to name.
Read full review
  • Positive tracking of ledger information for all areas of the organization. Our organization has multiple business units that require the accurate and complete tracking of transactions and budgetary history going back multiple years, which PeopleSoft Financials has done
  • Ability to connect with external vendors easily and to export any and all file types and connect to service operations/web services as well as accept and process transactions from external systems has brought a positive impact
  • PeopleSoft provides the framework to reconcile transactions across the organization and within different business units to provide transparency and transactional history for metrics and data analysis
Read full review
ScreenShots