Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
SAP S/4HANA Cloud is a modular ERP that enables users to run mission-critical operations in real time from anywhere, introduce new business models in any industry, and expand globally. SAP S/4HANA Cloud is a SaaS product and can also be deployed in a hybrid landscape for quicker time to value. SAP S/4HANA Cloud is a foundational component of the SAP…
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GP
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
Per user, per month
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GP
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GP
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.3
Ratings
15% above category average
Pay calculation
6.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
Ratings
9% below category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
API for custom integration
7.00 Ratings
7.90 Ratings
Plug-ins
7.00 Ratings
7.90 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
Ratings
25% below category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Single sign-on capability
6.00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
7.9
Ratings
9% above category average
Dashboards
7.00 Ratings
7.90 Ratings
Standard reports
7.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Custom reports
6.00 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
15% below category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.3
Ratings
7% above category average
Accounts payable
6.00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Cash management
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
7.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
7.00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
Ratings
8% below category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Inventory tracking
7.00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Automatic reordering
6.00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Location management
8.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Manufacturing module
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.4
Ratings
7% above category average
Pricing
6.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Order entry
7.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
6.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Order Orchestration
8.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
9.3
Ratings
30% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.3
Ratings
12% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.3
Ratings
18% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
9.8
Ratings
40% above category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.2
Ratings
21% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
7.90 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.5
Ratings
14% above category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.3
Ratings
15% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
It does accounting really well, it does payroll not so well. I say this because when you get into states that have complicated payroll laws like California, overtime calculations are hard to setup and get right. Same goes for other states when they do out of the normal pay structure like piece rate pay. It does HR, A/P and A/R really well and we have had no issues on that side; just payroll when it comes to certain states and how we do anything that is not salary or hourly.
The software reduces the stress of managing multiple departments in the supply chain sector. It offers great performance for both small and large businesses. With the built-in AI, it improves the overall efficiency of the organization and helps in reducing maintenance. The product customer care and support services are available 24/7.
Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Having an integration between Project Accounting and Field Service would be amazing! There are so many companies that have service technicians that perform work on a customer's contract but also have a need for project accounting functionality within that customer's contract. Right now those modules are separate so you either need to use one or duplicate some efforts if you need to use both.
Microsoft Dynamics GP could do a better job documenting their new enhancements to the product. They realize great enhancements but the documentation about them, or new products, is lacking so it is difficult as a consultant to know everything a new feature can do for me and my customers.
They could enhance their forecasting capabilities with a new forecasting tool within Management Reporter.
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
I am not part of the team that makes this decision but I would recommend renewing the contract. Most employees at Tennant are long term employees and would find it difficult to change to a different software. They are comfortable using SAP.
Overall usability of the older model is not quite so user friendly for the basic bookeeper, but at an accountants level we can generate all the necessary reports and create Sales Orders, Purchase orders and invoices - though it is a bit redundant to enter the sales and purchase orders separately instead of being able to convert a sales order directly to a puchase order by applying a price book like the newer versions can.
SAP S/4HANA Cloud has a super flexible and intuitive dashboard, allowing every user to navigate effectively. It also has powerful customer help, which acts as a guide for new subscribers. The features deployed are realistic and functional, without defects. Constant changes and updates are proactively shared.
The support system I find great as whenever I run into problems they rectify them quickly as possible they never reacted late the support is just up to the mark for me. They provide many solutions to the problems I faced the [technical] team support is always amazing they [listen] to mean work accordingly.
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
SAP requires a lot of internal and external resources to complete its successful implementation. The cloud version requires a deeper understanding of the different capabilities of the local systems (hardware) and the connection towards your local IT team. We found several problems on our systems that we couldn't foresee before the implementation and roll out.
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Previously we had implemented Azure Cloud Services which had cost us excessively compared to SAP cloud. Also I found the user interface easier to work with compared to the azure cloud as well. Overall the features are really good compared to Azure and cost is also less compared to it
If implemented properly, the product can save many hours of data entry time - specifically by setting up integrations of large data sets.
Many times the underlying business process must be adjusted to accommodate software limitations. By being flexible, a company can leverage their users' skills in combination with GP to make data entry faster and more efficient. I have seen many companies eliminate the need for data entry personnel as well as reallocate employee hours to more skilled positions such as reporting and analytics.
Poor implementations, on the other hand, can cause employees to hate their jobs and the software. This isn't specific to GP but to the software industry in general.