Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is a solution that helps users model and plan across finance, HR, supply chain, and sales, streamline the financial close process.
$250
per user/per month
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
EPM Standard
$250
per user/per month
EPM Enterprise
$500
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing per user varies by component within the Oracle EPM Cloud solution. Please see pricing information for the EPM Cloud components on cloud.oracle.com or contact Oracle Sales at +1.800.633.0738.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
Ratings
9% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
API for custom integration7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
Ratings
25% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
15% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Accounts payable6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Pricing6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.6
Ratings
31% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
Ratings
12% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.0
Ratings
9% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.9
Ratings
25% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
Ratings
5% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
Ratings
9% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.8
Ratings
6% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
Ratings
13% above category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
Ratings
9% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
It does accounting really well, it does payroll not so well. I say this because when you get into states that have complicated payroll laws like California, overtime calculations are hard to setup and get right. Same goes for other states when they do out of the normal pay structure like piece rate pay. It does HR, A/P and A/R really well and we have had no issues on that side; just payroll when it comes to certain states and how we do anything that is not salary or hourly.
Read full review
It is well suited in a geographically distributed environment where you have various key participants in multiple time zones providing input and necessary explanations on performance and measured success It is less appropriate where you have a single office environment with a single finance department working together. It is also less suited when the GL is NOT an Oracle product and the interface between the GL and the reporting software needs to be implemented with utmost care and handling.
Read full review
Pros
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
  • Account Reconciliation CLoud Services provides tight integration with Oracle R12 and 11i . Provides drillback capability. It is flexible and provides rich functionality to users.
  • We have implemented ARCS on cloud and migrated planning and budgeting from On premise to PBCS and EPBCS. Functionality is onpar with onpremise. Provides regular updates monthly
  • We don't need to upgrades every year and saved a lot on Hardware.
Read full review
Cons
  • Having an integration between Project Accounting and Field Service would be amazing! There are so many companies that have service technicians that perform work on a customer's contract but also have a need for project accounting functionality within that customer's contract. Right now those modules are separate so you either need to use one or duplicate some efforts if you need to use both.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP could do a better job documenting their new enhancements to the product. They realize great enhancements but the documentation about them, or new products, is lacking so it is difficult as a consultant to know everything a new feature can do for me and my customers.
  • They could enhance their forecasting capabilities with a new forecasting tool within Management Reporter.
Read full review
  • Our implementation consultant set up all the business rules for calculations to get us live, and we may have difficulty setting up new ones going forward. We feel like that we now need to hire someone who has the technical knowledge to help us to manage the system going forward.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
We have a pretty good userbase who are at the high level who gained value from this tool. Discontinuing this tool is prone to impact their day to day operations. Also the data in this tool cannot alter the source, which maintains the integrity of this tool. Smartview is a cool addition that gained lot of traction as well.
Read full review
Usability
Overall usability of the older model is not quite so user friendly for the basic bookeeper, but at an accountants level we can generate all the necessary reports and create Sales Orders, Purchase orders and invoices - though it is a bit redundant to enter the sales and purchase orders separately instead of being able to convert a sales order directly to a puchase order by applying a price book like the newer versions can.
Read full review
It produces consolidated multi currency reports faster and more accurately whilst adding additional pivotal functionality. The Smartview reporting is a key for us and a flagstone of the application
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
EPM has been so far available all the time
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The product performance is so far very good
Read full review
Support Rating
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Support from our implementation partner is a 10/10, but support from Oracle is awful. Case in point: recently over a 2-day period, there were a series of intermittent outages. Oracle actually asked US for the outage time-stamps. I would have thought that, since we were paying them, they should probably be able to tell us!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
The biggest key is data validation time. If you are implementing a new chart of accounts along with Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud, you need to multiply the time you think you can perform data validation by 2. The key to managing your project timeline is managing your expectations around data validation as well. For instance, it is recommended you convert 1-3 years vs. 5 years.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Read full review
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is one of the more robust and well-rounded EPMs on the market. It comes with robust out-of-the-box functionality which is a great benefit in comparison to its peers. The Excel integration is also top notch which Financial Analysts really appreciate. Cost is a little high and maintenance is a bit heaver than other tools so that is something to consider. The product keeps improving!
Read full review
Scalability
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
The product is scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • If implemented properly, the product can save many hours of data entry time - specifically by setting up integrations of large data sets.
  • Many times the underlying business process must be adjusted to accommodate software limitations. By being flexible, a company can leverage their users' skills in combination with GP to make data entry faster and more efficient. I have seen many companies eliminate the need for data entry personnel as well as reallocate employee hours to more skilled positions such as reporting and analytics.
  • Poor implementations, on the other hand, can cause employees to hate their jobs and the software. This isn't specific to GP but to the software industry in general.
Read full review
  • Significantly reduced the amount of money we spent for the maintenance of in-house hardware.
  • We now need less employees to manage the configurations of Oracle EPM Cloud.
  • There have been many time savings as a whole to apply to more productive causes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise DeploymentScreenshot of Planning and Forecasting - Decision-Oriented Plans with Instant Feedback Loop - What-If Modeling and SandboxScreenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of User Interface - Role-Based, Intuitive User Interface - Role-Based Navigation Flows - Microsoft Office InterfaceScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise Deployment