| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Microsoft Access | Score7.7 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Access is a database management system from Microsoft that combines the relational Microsoft Jet Database Engine with a graphical user interface and software-development tools. | $139.99 per PC |
| Microsoft Access | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Microsoft Access | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Microsoft Access C#, ASP.NET, SQL server Included with our office 365 licenses Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Microsoft Access Microsoft Access is a superb software in database management system. I have been using it for many years without any hesitations. The software is making it different from other software with its awesome features. The software is cost effective for the organisation. It also … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Microsoft Access Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Microsoft Access I haven't really used another database product other than Microsoft Access since the mid-90s. I don't even remember which program I did use, but needless to say, it did not have as much functionality nor was it as user friendly as databases today. So I really can't say how … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Microsoft Access Crystal is easier for report writing, but isn't a database solution. Salesforce is lovely, but much more expensive than an old copy of Microsoft Office. For a small budget, [Microsoft] Access was really the only viable option. I only wish it was easier to write complex reports. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Microsoft Access [Selected Microsoft Access for] employee learning simplicity, attractive graphical environment and features of Microsoft 365 with responsive Microsoft support. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Microsoft Access Visual FoxPro is a discontinued software, and no longer has support. Also, very few people still use it, or ever know how to use it. Excel is very popular, but [Microsoft] Access can do things like data joins much easier and faster Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Microsoft Access NA Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Microsoft Access Being a similar "Windows application" it's easier to start to use as part of Office. Also, the GUI capabilities are much more advanced than other high-performance databases. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Microsoft Access MS SQL is a more powerful tool but I love the reporting feature in MS Access. MS Excel is useful for complex calculations but to me, MS Access helps me organize that data. InfoPath is similar to MS Access in that you can create forms for data entry, but it does not include … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Microsoft Access FileMaker Pro focuses more on data collection in a single, flat file while Access allows for relationships to be drawn between data tables the reduces duplication. I have not worked with FileMaker Pro for several years but found it to be very unwieldy for my needs which were … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Microsoft Access We tried Salesforce, which was expensive and not as customizable as Access. QuickBase also was pricey compared to already having an MS license with the existing package, and QuickBase was not very intuitive. The other option was an open source version which was less intuitive … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
100% Would buy again 25 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
100% Delivers good value for the price 25 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
96% Happy with the feature set 24 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
90% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
95% Implementation went as expected 18 Answers | |
| Microsoft Access | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  SingleStore Score7.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies |  SAP HANA Cloud Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises |  SAP IQ Score10 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Microsoft Access | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 5.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 |
| Usability | 7.0 |
| Availability | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | 6.4 |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 |
| Ease of integration | 8.0 |
| Product Scalability | 5.0 |
| Microsoft Access | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
| Usability |
|
| Reliability and Availability |
|
| Support Rating |
|
| Implementation Rating |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots |
