TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

MFT Gateway vs. Microsoft BizTalk Server

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    MFT Gateway

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AN/A

    $9

    per month

    Microsoft BizTalk

    Score6.3 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    MFT GatewayMicrosoft BizTalk
    Editions & Modules
    Basic
    $9
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    MFT GatewayMicrosoft BizTalk
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    MFT GatewayMicrosoft BizTalk
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (7 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    MFT GatewayMicrosoft BizTalk
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Aayu Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    BizTalk is well suited as middleware. Where you wish to translate an input file into an output file and send it to some endpoint. In our case, we used it to convert and send files to SAP. In many ways, it very flexible, and you can do almost anything you want with it. In many ways, it's a better solution than your SAP XI or PI as middleware, since it's much less expensive, and allows you do interface with non-SAP systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Aayu Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    • It is very user friendly. Users can change rules during run time and change workflow.
    • Huge capacity for queueing messages. It supports all types of adapters like Oracle, Salesforce, SMTP, FTP, etc. Also users can built custom adaptors.
    • If users want to dynamically deploy their solution without any downtime, this is a perfect solution. BizTalk will be a good fit, especially for public-facing websites.
    • Well-proven in the market. I used it when developing a website for Virgin Trains, catering more than 800K user requests per day.
    • Helps in load balancing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Aayu Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    • Microsoft BizTalk is over engineered for some situtations
    • Microsoft BizTalk can be frustrating to use as it forces you to use the GUI as opposed to code
    • Microsoft BizTalk is very resource intensive to create integrations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Aayu Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    BizTalk will always be required at this hospital.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Aayu Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    I gave a 7 because this product BizTalk does need time and training to get familiar with the usability and features, it is not that easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Aayu Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    BizTalk Server has been supported for more than 15 years. It is well proven in the market. Microsoft has provided excellent support with technical issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Aayu Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Make sure you have everybody and all depts. On board during testing on test server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Aayu Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    BizTalk was selected here mainly because it is easy to integrate to a .NET application (most of them are Web Service, WCF SOAP, WCF REST and Web API) and many backend databases are Microsoft SQL Server. Another benefit is that the monitoring job is easy to set up and centralize with other .NET application monitoring jobs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Aayu Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    • A positive impact has been the quicker turnaround time of a part request and that part showing up in SAP using Biztalk as middleware.
    • A somewhat negative impact has been the somewhat insufficient error logging/message capture settings that Biztalk provide. This has caused occasional delays when attempted to create parts for the business.
    • A somewhat negative impact has been the need to have a specialized developer who understands Biztalk to troubleshoot issues with the Biztalk and SAP interaction when creating parts, and when adding new fields to the parts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots