TrustRadius

Medidata Rave CTMS vs. Quanta View

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Rave CTMS
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Medidata Solutions, headquartered in New York offers their cloud-based clinical trial management system, Rave CTMS to support real-time tracking and reporting of study progress and data reconciliation.N/A
Quanta View
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Quanta View, "The Clinical eBox" is a multi-function Web application (e-CRF and CTMS). A modular, multi-lingual solution, it adapts to different study designs and boasts various functionalities. It is described by the vendor as simple to use, and they state the application meets both the expectations of a non-interventional study and those of a comparative interventional study.N/A
Pricing
Medidata Rave CTMSQuanta View
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Rave CTMSQuanta View
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
User Ratings
Medidata Rave CTMSQuanta View
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Medidata Rave CTMSQuanta View
Likelihood to Recommend
I think this is a great tool overall. We aren't using all of the available features of the system (we don't use the system for EDC or site payments for example), so I can't comment on anything other than study and site management
KL
Kimberly Lubragge
Associate Director, Clinical Quality Assurance
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Study and site creation and management
  • Task management
  • Tracking key study milestones
  • Reporting
KL
Kimberly Lubragge
Associate Director, Clinical Quality Assurance
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Setting up ad hoc reports isn't very intuitive
  • System performance issues
KL
Kimberly Lubragge
Associate Director, Clinical Quality Assurance
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Improved productivity
  • Improved transparency
  • No longer having to use multiple trackers to manage key study details and metrics
KL
Kimberly Lubragge
Associate Director, Clinical Quality Assurance
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots