TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Maxio

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AMaxio helps B2B SaaS companies maximize their revenue operations. The financial operations platform is designed to meet the unique financial challenges of B2B SaaS, including billing, subscription management, revenue & expense recognition, and SaaS metrics & analytics.

    $599

    per month

    Oracle Textura Payment Management

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/AA construction payment management application that helps general contractors, owners, and subcontractors simplify and automate the draw process. Reduces risk by securely managing lien waivers and compliance. Increases visibility to downstream payments to minimize the risk of disruption and ensure the entire supply chain is paid on time for work completed.N/A
    Pricing
    MaxioOracle Textura Payment Management
    Editions & Modules
    Build
    $0
    30 Day Trial
    Grow
    $599
    per month up to $100k in monthly billings
    Scale
    Custom
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    MaxioOracle Textura Payment Management
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsBuild Plan - Developer-friendly sandbox where you can try out billing for free for 30 days. Grow Plan - Complete B2B subscription management platform with billing, revenue recognition, and reporting. Scale Plan - Tailored solution to support high billing volumes and advanced requirements. Talk with Sales about available volume-based discounts.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    MaxioOracle Textura Payment Management
    Considered Both Products
    Maxio (previously SaaSOptics + Chargify)
    No answer on this topic
    Oracle
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    75%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    75%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    75%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    80%
    Implementation went as expected
    4 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    MaxioOracle Textura Payment Management
    Accounts Receivable
    Comparison of Accounts Receivable features of Maxio and Oracle Textura Payment Management
    Feature
    Maxio
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Textura Payment Management
    9.8
    1 Ratings
    0% above category average
    Invoice Control00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Payment Tracking00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Automatic Reminders00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Payment Reconciliation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Dispute Resolution00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    MaxioOracle Textura Payment Management
    Small Businesses
    WooCommerce Subscriptions
    Score7.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Chargebee
    Score7.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Zuora
    Score8.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    MaxioOracle Textura Payment Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (23 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    MaxioOracle Textura Payment Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Maxio (previously SaaSOptics + Chargify)
    In my opinion, Maxio is well suited for a large company with simple products/billing scenarios and 10s of thousands of dollars available to waste on implementation, learning curve, and mistakes. For any other company, I do not advise purchasing Maxio.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    For a GC that wants to make things easier for both the themselves and all subs, this is absolutely the best solution out there. Some GCs still approve changes using purchase orders rather than change orders and allow invoicing to occur at any time during the month However, they should change their process to align with Oracle Textura Payment Management's draws. Without a draw process and confirmed invoice submission along with ACH payments, we have had invoices lost, payments lost, and time lost from having to track all of it. I can't think of a reason it would not be appropriate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Maxio (previously SaaSOptics + Chargify)
    • Managing deferred revenue.
    • Contract management is flexible and allows us to see data that we never had before.
    • Billing is painless and is now done within a couple hours. Previously it would take at least 1-2 days.
    • Business Metrics and Reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • AIA Billing
    • ACH Payments
    • SOV Management
    • Communications
    • User Management
    • Compliance Holds
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Maxio (previously SaaSOptics + Chargify)
    • Options for Cash-based businesses. While it's not GAAP compliant and most users are accrual, many SaaS start ups are still small and operating on a cash basis.
    • Commissions Module since SO already has all our data intergrations
    • So many different features and data entry points that manual data entry errors are common
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Task Management needs a "Mark all as Read" or similar function. They pile up per job and are only able to be completed using certain links and processes.
    • Payment Notification emails should include payment details including amount(s), joint check info, and check numbers.
    • Projects should be able to be removed or archived by the subcontractor. We have jobs showing on our home page that are 3+ years since completion.
    • Retention billing is very confusing and should be communicated more clearly. There should also be a button that allows for all retention to be billed at once rather than having to type in the amount per line item.
    • Sub-Tiers should not be a menu to click through if there are no sub-tiers for a sub.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Maxio (previously SaaSOptics + Chargify)
    They are a crucial piece of what we do. We hope to have them as a vendor for a long time to come.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Maxio (previously SaaSOptics + Chargify)
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    Although there are minor improvements to be made, Oracle Textura Payment Management is far and away the easiest payment solution out there for any invoicing procedure that requires monthly draws.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Maxio (previously SaaSOptics + Chargify)
    They are willing to help with most challenges and are pretty easy to get ahold of by phone. They are limited in their reach, when it comes to bulk cancellations, along with some other bulk edits. It is no fault to them, Chargify is just a system that hasn’t been upgraded much over the years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Maxio (previously SaaSOptics + Chargify)
    I inherited SaaSOptics from several predecessors that worked on it before me. I believe they used Chargebee or Chargify before SaaSOptics, but I haven't used them. I pray that the market comes up with a better product for subscription revenue management, SaaS metric reporting, and financial projections. Unfortunately, I don't have the time or the team to be able to successfully complete the transition to new software at this time, so I feel like I'm stuck with SaaSOptics at this point
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Oracle Textura Payment Management is better and more refined than similar products. Procore has a ton of other useful features and GCPay is straightforward with a simple UI. Like most things in tech, it comes down to user base and Oracle Textura Payment Management has the most jobs of ours using it meaning it has the biggest positive impact on our business.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Maxio (previously SaaSOptics + Chargify)
    • Limitations in Chargify's invoicing capability has resulted in our finance team having to manually send invoices from our accounting system. This has resulted in 10-15 hours a week of resource wasted on something that Chargify should automatically do. If this isn't addressed, then the wasted time will increase as we scale.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Oracle Textura Payment Management has dramatically improved our AR process (when the GC uses it). We wish that every job used it so we wouldn't have to deal with the dozens of builder-specific invoicing processes each month. Before Oracle Textura Payment Management, each builder had specific process we had to follow in order to get paid. After GCs started to use it, we have been able to consolidate multiple clients and jobs into a single easy-to-learn and easy-to-teach process that allows us to submit invoices easily and track when we are going to get paid.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots