Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS vs. OpenText ALM/Quality Center
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | Score10 out of 10 | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | Matrix Requirements helps medical device companies to manage their design and quality system, offering products that manage medical device requirements, specifications, risks and tests ensuring full traceability and ensuring compliance regulations for quality systems. MatrixALM can be used to manage all design inputs and outputs in one place and makes it visible for the whole team at any time supporting any workflow: Waterfall, V-Model or Agile. | $500 per month per user |
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | OpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. | N/A |
| Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | We also have an enterprise offering. Speak to our team to learn more! | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Would buy again 5 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Delivers good value for the price 4 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Polarion ALM Score9.8 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score9.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | PTC Windchill RV&S Score7.7 out of 10 | PTC Windchill RV&S Score7.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Polarion ALM Score9.8 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score9.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 7.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 3.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.4 |
| Ease of integration | - | 1.0 |
| Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |



