Site24x7 from ManageEngine is a full-stack application, website, server, cloud and network monitoring tool. Site24x7 offers code-level diagnostics and customizable error thresholds, end-to-end monitoring with topology visualization tools, and mobile accessibility.
$9
10 monitors
SolarWinds AppOptics
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SolarWinds AppOptics (formerly Librato) is an IT infrastructure monitoring service and APM, based on technology acquired by SolarWinds with Librato in 2015 to expand its cloud monitoring portfolio.
N/A
Pricing
ManageEngine Site24x7
SolarWinds AppOptics
Editions & Modules
Starter
$9.00
10 monitors
Pro
$35.00
40 Monitors
Classic
$89.00
100 Monitors
Elite
$225.00
250 Monitors
Enterprise
$449.00
500 Monitors
Enterprise Plus Web
$899.00
2500 Monitors
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ManageEngine Site24x7
SolarWinds AppOptics
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$1 monitors
No setup fee
Additional Details
Each Pack will also support additional benefits such as Network interfaces, Applogs, Alert credits etc. You can also, purchase add-ons to create custom pricing options. Please visit the vendor's pricing page, for more information.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ManageEngine Site24x7
SolarWinds AppOptics
Features
ManageEngine Site24x7
SolarWinds AppOptics
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine Site24x7
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
SolarWinds AppOptics
-
Ratings
Remote monitoring
9.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Network device monitoring
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple Server Monitoring
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-device monitoring
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated alerts and notifications
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Management Tasks
Comparison of Management Tasks features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine Site24x7
7.4
Ratings
0% above category average
SolarWinds AppOptics
-
Ratings
Policy-based automation
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
Comparison of Reporting features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine Site24x7
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
SolarWinds AppOptics
-
Ratings
Performance data reports
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable reporting
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data visualization
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk analysis
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine Site24x7
6.6
Ratings
5% above category average
SolarWinds AppOptics
-
Ratings
Antivirus and malware management
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
I have tried other tools (PRTG etc) in the past, and switched from US monitor to [Site24x7 All-in-One Monitoring], for all the built-in features and ability to implement by using with or without the agents deployed (ip discovery LAN). This is one tool that encompasses the entire organization and allows that single pane of glass feel (NOC screen view) for an accurate virtual snapshot of your entire organization, either cloud and/or LAN.
AppOptics is good for small to medium-sized organizations with less than 150 servers or less than 40 services to monitor. It performs well for this use case where people need to get an overview of application performance, and 95%ile data is okay. Somewhere every data point and every record is critical; it should be avoided.
Alerts: Site24x7 can be configured to send alerts in all sorts of ways, from email, to text messages, to even direct automated phone calls.
Internal monitoring: An agent installed on one or more machines can monitor internal connectivity to other network devices. This means if connectivity to a server goes down, we often know about it before users alert us.
External monitoring: Site24x7 also watched our websites and sends alerts if they're unreachable. It uses multiple locations to do so, which means if there's a partial network outage in some part of the country, we know who is affected.
The only thing that I would add is the possibility to display every single query our servers receive to eventually analyze them and query through them. We could also generate nice visualizations from that. Right now I believe we can only see averages.
AppOptics has performed well for all of the major functions we have needed it for. Especially when it comes to tracking down response time issues and researching app performance for different pages and different times of day we have been able to do everything we need to. We know there are some more advanced features that could help us in more niche areas, but haven't had the time to delve deeper into using or setting them up.
I have only had to use support once, so I can't go into much detail about their support team. The one time I did use it the response was fast but the resolution took some time.
Solarwinds AppOptics is rated as 9 out of 10 and the reason is there are still few areas where AppOptics needs to improve such as Service Now Integration, GCP Cloud Support, Better Dashboard visualization for application transactions flow. Other than these feature everything is there in AppOptics and that's a reason given 9 points out of 10.
Site24x7 [All-in-One Monitoring] has some similarities to ThousandEyes. Especially in the troubleshooting aspect where both offer Web performance waterfall charts to analyze the issue better. Both have cloud-based servers globally that allow to determine performance on the Internet. Site24x7 has more features available so we selected it instead.
What we found positive in AppOptics from others is:
Easy to install and manage.
Various stack support.
Point to point deep-dive metrics and correlation.
Metrics like DB connection, query analysis, latency in API calls, and other connections, response codes for various APIs, etc are the key ones in our case, which AppOptics provides efficiently.
Positivity wise, we're spending a third of what we were on our website monitoring, this has allowed us to focus funding elsewhere (namely SolarWinds).
We have enhanced our core monitoring by now also being able to provide better coverage, whereas we were handicapped with our previous supplier due to the scaling costs of multi-step transactions.
The general feeling from our IT staff is that the platform is not great, which obviously reduces confidence in the ability for the platform to provide accurate monitoring data for our websites.