ThreatDown (formerly Malwarebytes for Business), combines Malwarebytes' endpoint security capabilities in four bundles. The basic Core tier includes incident response, Next-gen AV, device control, vulnerability assessments, and the ability to block unwanted application.
$345
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
Tenable Security Center
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) from Tenable Network Security in Baltimore, presents a vulnerabiliy management option used to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk to businesses. It is managed on premises.
N/A
Pricing
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Tenable Security Center
Editions & Modules
Core
$345
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
Advanced
$395
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
Elite
$495
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
Ultimate
$595
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Tenable Security Center
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Optional Add-Ons include server and mobile device protection. Server protection ranges from $129 to $179 per annum depending on service tier. Mobile security is $10 per device, no matter the service tier. A 10% discount is offered for choosing a two-year billing plan.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Tenable Security Center
Features
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Tenable Security Center
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
8.8
Ratings
3% above category average
Tenable Security Center
-
Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
9.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Centralized Management
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Infection Remediation
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Malware Detection
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
-
Ratings
Tenable Security Center
9.6
Ratings
19% above category average
Network Analytics
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Threat Recognition
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Threat Analysis
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
I would absolutely recommend Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection to a colleague and I have recommended it to many of my peers in the IT world. Malwarebytes is well suited for any environment that requires protection from mal/ransomware which is most companies these days. In particular for companies that host their own big data that the operation of the company relies on. The only place Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection may not be AS appropriate would be one where there is near zero reliance on computers, networks and data.
Tenable.sc is best suited for those organizations who are not very comfortable with Cloud and want an on-premises solution. If any organization has to follow some guidelines that no data should go to the cloud, in this case, Tenable.sc is a perfect fit as it's installed in the infra Datacenter and no data goes to Cloud. Tenable.sc won't be appropriate for those who have their infra setup on cloud.
The biggest plus with this software is that you can manage all the clients from a management console. You can push the install/updates through it. If the client cannot connect to the management console, then it will update directly from their website. This means you are always up to date and protected.
The software on the client machine has very low overhead so it doesn't affect the performance.
You can create policies based on the types of users or by the department. You can customize these policies so it will let you micro-manage the clients.
When I first used the tool in my home systems MANY years ago, I wished for a Business version. I was once at a focus group for a major antivirus company, and one attendee’s feedback to “what could we do better?” was “buy out MalwareBytes and add it to your tool”. I’ve used the Business version since it first became available, and have continued to be a dedicated user through the many iterations and improvements
It simply works. It doesn't require the hand-holding and monitoring that some other solutions do. It's simple to deploy and maintain, and adding custom content such as Exceptions require minimal effort. I’ve had to add a few exceptions for internal-use, in-house-developed tools, but it’s quite simple to do so within the online interface
Whenever I've had a query for the support team, they have got back to me very quickly, and given me very well detailed advice on fixing whatever the issue I had was. They also pointed me to help documents and such where I could find more information if I needed
On all of the occasions that I have had to reach out to Tenable for assistance, they have been extremely helpful and knowledgeable. Solutions and support are provided quickly, and they work on the issue until it is resolved.
I first implemented this more than 10 years ago, when it required an in-site setup with SQL Server (or SQL Express), and even that was pretty easy. With the move to centralized web management some treats ago, it’s become even easier to deploy
I think Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection is hands down better from any point of view other than price. Malwarebytes is a little bit more costly than Webroot. However, Malwarebytes detects more threats, protects against more malicious URL's, allows more in customization of policies, has better administration GUI, and has better means of implementation.
Tenable.sc [(formerly SecurityCenter)] has been around for a long time and in our opinion offered the easiest configuration for compliance scanning and it's rating system was more impressive than Rapid 7's.