Magic xpa Application Platform vs. Oracle GlassFish Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Magic xpa Application Platform
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Magic xpa Application Platform is an application server and infrastructure from Magic Technologies in California.N/A
Oracle GlassFish Server
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle GlassFish Server was originally developed by Sun Microsystems and is available open source or supported by Oracle. It is an application server.N/A
Pricing
Magic xpa Application PlatformOracle GlassFish Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Magic xpa Application PlatformOracle GlassFish Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Magic xpa Application PlatformOracle GlassFish Server
Features
Magic xpa Application PlatformOracle GlassFish Server
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Magic xpa Application Platform
7.0
Ratings
12% below category average
Oracle GlassFish Server
8.8
Ratings
11% above category average
IDE support6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Security management8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Administration and management7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Application server performance7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Installation8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance6.00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
User Ratings
Magic xpa Application PlatformOracle GlassFish Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Magic xpa Application PlatformOracle GlassFish Server
Likelihood to Recommend
In our experience, the product performs really well when interfacing systems with ERP's through SQL server database tables, but we've even made some interfaces with the web service functionality included with the magic xpi integration platform. Also, we've made some SAP Business One - SAP Business One interfaces, for copying information from one company to another and even between two different ERP systems.
Read full review
The benefits outweigh the costs, and the ability to spin up a full cluster deployment for our internal applications on demand has been a game changer. We are able to leverage our engineers' core talents as J2EE developers without them concerning themselves with the infrastructure machinery of managing a highly available fault-tolerant server.
Read full review
Pros
  • The UI is really simple to use, you have source/destination mapping for the items.
  • The scheduler gives you a lot of options when executing the models.
  • The error handling is usually pretty good and the errors can be corrected fast.
Read full review
  • Oracle Glassfish servers provide us the ability to deploy in clusters and provide replication facilities.
  • The server provides very easy administration console that can be used to tweak basic features for timeouts and database thread pooling.
  • It can easily be configured for single sign on for enterprise clients.
Read full review
Cons
  • Although the scenarios may be online, the main service usually freezes and the processes can't transact any data. With a single restart of the service, the processes will be functioning again.
  • The support for more applications would be nice, even though there is a nice number of them. Most of the main applications in the market are supported.
  • The licensing for the software may be a little confusing; you can't buy individual licenses as they come in packages of four.
Read full review
  • When we use the versions of GlassFish Server that were just released to the market, it causes bugs to appear. While there are workarounds to solve them in most cases, the amount of time to solve them is significant. Therefore, I would advise waiting for it to be a little more stable and for a few months to pass before proceeding to an update of a productive environment.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Honestly, we have only used and evaluated magic xpi/xpa platforms because of the recommendation of our SAP Business One main supplier, who has previously used the platform for their developments. So far, we have no regrets with the acquisition of the platform and we are very happy with its performance.
Read full review
Tomcat is a more lightweight container in comparison to Oracle's Glassfish server and has wider adaptability in development for local testing. Glassfish however, as an enterprise product can offer better after sales service to clients.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The implementation time for this kind of projects has been greatly reduced.
  • Certifying an In-House resource in the Magix xpi and xpa platforms is probably the best option, considering all of the projects that can be developed in the future without the need of an external consultant.
  • The processes that have been automatized with the Magic xpi platform helped reduce human error and the time those processes took to finish.
Read full review
  • The platform has been stable for us so we do not experience falls or service interruptions. The investment is lower compared to other solutions in the market and we have solid support from Oracle.
Read full review
ScreenShots