Lyssna vs. Solid User Tests

Lyssna

Solid User Tests

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Lyssna	Score 7.5 out of 10	N/A	Lyssna (formerly UsabilityHub) is a user research platform used to test digital products with real users and gain insights into their audience. Its tools and features help Lyssna to optimize users' designs and create more engaging user-friendly experiences. Lyssna is a research platform, offering a broad range of testing features including: Five Second Testing - Used to quickly test the effectiveness of landing pages, messaging and designs by showing users a…	$0 3 seats included
Solid User Tests	Score 10.0 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Solid is a user testing solution featuring Anna, a virtual avatar, that moderates tests for the user. Solid allows researchers to run tests where testers don't behave unnaturally. They are not told to read scripts or think aloud in unusual sequences. This hurts their testing experience. Instead, Solid gives them space to go at their own pace, and to think aloud only when they become silent. Solid enables users to test prototypes, websites and native apps, or anything as long as a…	$99 per month per user

Pricing

Lyssna

Solid User Tests

Editions & Modules

Free: $0
3 seats included
Basic: $89
per month 3 seats included, maximum 10 seats
Pro: $199
per month 3 seats included, maximum 15 seats
Enterprise: Contact Sales
custom seats

Single: $249
one-time fee per study
Pro: Starts at 99
per month per user
Enterprise: Price on request
per month per user

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Lyssna	Solid User Tests
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Discount available for annual plan. Panel responses are priced seperately.

Solid offers two different payment plans: - per study: one-time fee - per user: monthly or yearly fee A per-user payment plan is scalable for up to 6 researchers (editors)

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Lyssna	Solid User Tests

Best Alternatives
	Lyssna	Solid User Tests
Small Businesses	Smartlook Score 8.2 out of 10	Smartlook Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Lyssna	Solid User Tests
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	7.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Lyssna	Solid User Tests
Likelihood to Recommend	I think it's well suited to any scenario where something requires feedback, whether it's exploratory feedback of current designs or validation that a new design solves a problem & additional feedback can be gathered to make it even better. I'd recommend UsabilityHub to anybody who isn't 100% sure on a design, and if they are, they need to use it to confirm that certainty. Incentivized Lee Preston Conversion Rate Optimisation Consultant Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Very fast - you can have responses in minutes. Very easy and straightforward to use. The interface is clear and intuitive. They offer suggestions for questions that are effective, which is very helpful for a first time user. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	More targeted screening A portal of all opportunities rather than email invites Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	Due to its simplicity and design it is really easy to navigate. You can clearly understand which sections you have completed and which are still left to be done. It is also really easy to change ordering of content etc, which I have found hasn’t been an option in other tools which means it is a really lengthy task of rewriting all of the tasks or questions to get them in the correct order that is desired. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Maze has a more comprehensive reporting presentation compared to Usabilityhub. Maze's interface is clean and modern but it lacks a simple intuitive testing set found in UsabilityHub. The terminology of a Maze is slightly confusing, flow tests are integrated with only Figma, Xd, Invision, Sketch, and Marvel prototypes. The final test interface shown to users is confusing and could have been simpler like UsabilityHub. Incentivized Calvin Pedzai Senior UX Designer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Positive - It would give us responses significantly faster than testing out a concept on a live site Positive - It allowed us to reach a wider audience for our tests (beyond our website traffic) Positive - The quick turnaround time and quality of feedback encouraged other internal units to want to test more as they saw the return quickly. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots	Lyssna Screenshots	Solid User Tests Screenshots