Loopio vs. Qwilr

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Loopio
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Loopio is a Toronto-based RFP response software provider that helps companies streamline their process for RFPs, DDQs, and Security Questionnaires. Loopio’s RFP response software is for RFIs, Security Questionnaires, DDQs, and sales proposals.N/A
Qwilr
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Qwilr is designed to change the way a business creates and shares documents on the web. This solution allows businesses to turn traditional documents into powerful and interactive webpages that look great on any device. The vendor says this in turn offers businesses access to analytics and other helpful tools when sharing quotes, proposals and presentations with clients.
$39
per month per user
Pricing
LoopioQwilr
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Business
$39
per month per user
Enterprise
$590
per month 10 users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LoopioQwilr
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsQwilr is a freemium product. Users upgrade to the Business or Enterprise plans for access to premium features, like advanced analytics, security and branding controls, get sales material accepted, e-signed and collect payments via Stripe.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LoopioQwilr
Features
LoopioQwilr
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
Loopio
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Qwilr
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
Proposal branding8.40 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Proposal templates7.90 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Proposal content library updates9.20 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Guided proposal creation8.20 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Searchable proposal database9.40 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
Loopio
8.3
Ratings
2% above category average
Qwilr
8.6
Ratings
6% above category average
RFP management & response9.20 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval8.20 Ratings8.40 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls8.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow6.70 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface8.40 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
Loopio
7.3
Ratings
10% below category average
Qwilr
9.8
Ratings
19% above category average
Proposal distribution7.90 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Interactive proposals7.20 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Proposal content tracking6.90 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LoopioQwilr
Small Businesses
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 8.5 out of 10
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LoopioQwilr
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LoopioQwilr
Likelihood to Recommend
I use Loopio specifically for RFP's mostly. I think it is a great and adequate tool for this and much of what I think that needs to improve are not large needle movers for me since the software as a whole is fantastic. It is very easy to upload an RFP into Loopio and begin answering those questions or pulling from previously answered questions. I also will use Loopio for large client proposals and I often use the "search functionality within Loopio to see if I can find answers to clients questions. I like that I can also pull images from Loopio as well and often use those visualizations in my proposals.
Read full review
It is great for presentations to customers and keeping them engaged in your presentation. Although it is great for creating a highly customizable presentation, some users may want even more control over font, font size and font color. Some of my colleagues have expressed some dissatisfaction with the formatting as well as saving any formatting changes that have made.
Read full review
Pros
  • Ease of use - a few minutes' tutorial is enough for a newcomer to start using the tool.
  • Handy options - i.e. support in searching for the right answer
  • Often meaningful & useful releases
Read full review
  • Stock images are fantastic.
  • Extremely intuitive functionality.
  • Easy to drag and drop and can reuse complete building blocks makes it super easy to use.
Read full review
Cons
  • Having the ability to directly connect responses in multiple languages.
  • Ability to set up more people in the review cycle (we typically have a responder, and at least 2 reviewers).
Read full review
  • Quick support
  • Wish it was easier to turn the links on and off.
  • Some of their custom block styles could be easier to edit.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Great product with great service.
Read full review
Usability
Usability is good but falls short of excellent. The interface is clean and well organized. They clearly spent some time working on the UI and took some feedback from focus groups to help keep it tidy. On a few occasions, we have experienced a little bit of lag while updating the question database. I'd like to see just a little faster response time on a consistent basis.
Read full review
At the beginning, there is a slight learning curve, but once you get the way out of it, it becomes easy to use.
Read full review
Support Rating
They're very supportive and reply in a timely manner. Whenever I contacted the support I received a helpful reply that actually solved my issue. Quite often when my team suggested an improvement that would simplify and speed up our work it happened not long after which is perfect for us.
Read full review
Onboarding was very organized and simple. Our account manager made it easy for our team to learn the tool by organizing several group training sessions.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
  • User friendly--very simple
  • Reviews of libraries can be assigned
  • Non-named user licenses can be used by various people
  • Close Loop--changes can be added to library with just a few clicks
  • View text in library and can copy content
  • Reporting on reviews and usage and projects
  • Help center and assigned representative
  • Library duplicates functionality
Read full review
Qwilr was a really quick and easy setup, which I think is great for smaller teams that have simple sales processes and cycles. Once more complication is it will fall short in providing the level of control and detail that is needed for a larger sales team. The end product is very elegant but comes down to the needs of the organization.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has helped us keep data up to date and therefore provide better answers.
  • The amount of time it takes us to compile RFPs has decreased tremendously giving everyone more time to focus on their main roles.
Read full review
  • It has increased efficiency when delivering a marketing proposal by 50%
  • It has generated a positive impact of the company with our clients
Read full review
ScreenShots

Qwilr Screenshots

Screenshot of Projects DashboardScreenshot of Quoting toolScreenshot of Block stylesScreenshot of TemplatesScreenshot of WYSIWYG webpage creator/editorScreenshot of Analytics