LoadComplete vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LoadComplete
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.
$239
per month 100 virtual users
Oracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The Oracle Application Testing Suite is a legacy suite of tools. Oracle Application Testing Suite 13.1.0.1 shipped in 2017 was the last major release. Since then, two minor releases 13.2.0.1 and 13.3.0.1 were released with only smaller sets of new features.N/A
Pricing
LoadCompleteOracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Editions & Modules
Subscription Starter
$239
per month 100 virtual users
On-demand Starter
$287
one-time fee 100 virtual users
Subscription Pro
$699
per month 1000 virtual users
On-demand Pro
$887
one-time fee 1000 virtual users
Subscription Premium
$899
per month 2500 virtual users
On-demand Premium
$1,139
one-time fee 2500 virtual users
Enterprise
Let's chat
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LoadCompleteOracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsOn-demand plans contain a $4.99 monthly maintenance fee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LoadCompleteOracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Features
LoadCompleteOracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
LoadComplete
8.2
Ratings
3% below category average
Oracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
-
Ratings
End to end performance management8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated performance data9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Real time monitoring8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LoadCompleteOracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JMeter
JMeter
Score 9.3 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
JMeter
JMeter
Score 9.3 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LoadCompleteOracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LoadCompleteOracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Likelihood to Recommend
If we already use TestComplete for test automation and there is an urgent need to perform load testing, then it is easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has to improve a lot and support customization to suit our needs. I would say if load testing is the main criteria to use this tool, then there are other open-source tools like JMeter that can support better than this. Of course, as it is an enterprise tool it has very good reporting and record and playback options that I see as an advantage for basic users.
Read full review
The Oracle Application [Testing Suite] is used heavily in our organization for independent regions to perform Oracle upgrades. Baseline performance can be monitored before the upgrade and compared to a production query load, we are able to easily monitor server performance and make an accurate prediction of upgrade performance. DBA's are able to use the testing suite for ongoing validation of database performance during peak times.
Read full review
Pros
  • Smart built-in data correlation. Automatically helps to correlate different dynamic parameters like user session ids, authorization tokens, db-identifiers and so on. Works very fast and save your time for test development.
  • Record & Play feature - LoadComplete can record application servers' metrics like CPU and memory usage.
Read full review
  • It was easy to configure selenium test scripts for executing automated tests for our client front end applications.
  • Load and stress testing our payroll processing engine that experienced the highest traffic volumes became a breeze.
Read full review
Cons
  • Some of the cons of LoadComplete are that it gets slow when the size of the test increases. Also, the coding is not possible with LoadComplete.
  • Moreover, it needs to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on the needs. Also, some graphs remain empty which is confusing for me as a user and I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data.
Read full review
  • The application is ideal for places that have already contracted with Oracle, however, OATS is much more expensive than other software available on the market.
  • The setup and configuration for OATS requires a lot of technical expertise and in depth knowledge.
Read full review
Usability
Usability is really good because being an enterprise tool that might be an easy option to convince users to try this tool. It has a lot of easy-to-use, cool options.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It is one of the best platforms. LoadComplete is all over a jack of many traits. It provides us a detailed report to our system analytics as well as developers. Moreover, there is also a smart built-in data correlation in LoadComplete which helps to correlate different parameters like user session IDs, authorization tokens, and so on. Other than that, LoadComplete also has the ability to run tests in the cloud.
Read full review
We buy all things ORACLE in order to have a consistent experience and reduce the training and learning curve. We believe in ORACLE Corporation's commitment to quality and innovation and would not consider any other products. We are a large company and saving a few dollars on licensing is penny wise but pound foolish as we cannot afford unplanned downtime.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Negative: Licensing fees are too expensive.
  • Positive: Able to generate and present reports, Able to show developers where bottleneck shows up.
  • Positive: Easy to understand software to train new users.
Read full review
  • Oracle testing suite had a positive ROI immediately, as our web application downtimes were reduced dramatically after we could do automated regression and load testing.
  • The learning curve for OpenScript was steep for our team, and we had to spend a lot of work hours training staff and learning the product.
  • After users were trained properly, we were able to leverage the benefits of the suite immediately.
Read full review
ScreenShots