Lilt vs. Lokalise

Lilt is a great platform for translating and reviewing content for mainstream languages that are spoken by a large number of people such as Spanish, French, etc. in which case the machine translation tool does a great job of adding the appropriate fluency, grammar, and punctuations. The QA checks also likewise provide apt feedback with rarely any errors. The only shortfall for Lilt is when the content to be translated belongs to any non-mainstream languages (such as regional Indian state ones) and the most noticeable errors are thrown by the QA check tools which have several long-standing unfixed bugs.

Incentivized

Lokalise is a great product if you're looking to translate your software in multiple languages. It optimizes every process and gives you a large variety of features and integrations to ensure high translation quality, and efficient workflows for everyone involved

• Provide exact and fuzzy match feedback for translations
• Provide step by step segmented workflow for translating
• Great QA checks including Batch and Full to help detecting errors
• Good machine translation feedback to help translators

Incentivized

• Stores information
• Can do handle than 1 project

• Provide greater quality feedback for non-mainstream languages such as Indian regional
• Improve punctuation and grammar fluency for non-mainstream languages
• Fix long standing bug issues in QA check reporting mechanism

Incentivized

• machine translation options don't use the glossary terminology
• the WordPress integration isn't really usable in the current state
• email notifications settings are not detailed enough

We were actually intended to get Localize instead of Lokalise, the naming is very confusing.

• Lilt is helping my organization localize its products to a lot more languages
• Helps translating large content data like web pages with ease
• Improves overall quality of work done and hence help gain more clients

Incentivized