TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

LexisNexis CounselLink+ vs. Thomson Reuters HighQ

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CounselLink

    Score5 out of 10
    N/ALexisNexis' CounselLink+ is an enteprise level legal management solution that provides matter management, e-billing and reporting tools to help users manage clients.N/A

    HighQ

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AHighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A
    Pricing
    CounselLinkHighQ
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CounselLinkHighQ
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CounselLinkHighQ
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of LexisNexis CounselLink+ and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    LexisNexis CounselLink+
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Task Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Scheduling00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Mobile Access00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    Search00 Ratings9.62 Ratings
    Visual planning tools00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of LexisNexis CounselLink+ and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    LexisNexis CounselLink+
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.6
    2 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Chat00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Notifications00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Discussions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Surveys00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of LexisNexis CounselLink+ and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    LexisNexis CounselLink+
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    9.4
    2 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Versioning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Video files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Audio files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Document collaboration00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
    Access control00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
    Advanced security features00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CounselLinkHighQ
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Flock
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft Viva Engage
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Google Keep
    Score9.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CounselLinkHighQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CounselLinkHighQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    LexisNexis
    No answers on this topic
    Thomson Reuters
    HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    LexisNexis
    No answers on this topic
    Thomson Reuters
    • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
    • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
    • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    LexisNexis
    No answers on this topic
    Thomson Reuters
    • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    LexisNexis
    No answers on this topic
    Thomson Reuters
    The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    LexisNexis
    No answers on this topic
    Thomson Reuters
    I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    LexisNexis
    No answers on this topic
    Thomson Reuters
    • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
    • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
    • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots