Lano vs. Omnipresent
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Lano | N/A | N/A | An EOR service, Lano lets users hire, manage, and pay global teams with full compliance, without having to open a local entity. Lano offers HR, Finance, and Legal departments a compliance and payments platform to build and grow their global teams. Lano's solutions are designed to accommodate these changes and to allow companies to progress from one stage of their expansion to the next. With an integrations ecosystem designed to work harmoniously with the client's… | N/A |
Omnipresent | Score7.4 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Omnipresent is an Employer of Record (EOR) solution that enables companies to employ remote talent in over 160 countries. Their global HR services give companies the ability to hire international employees without setting up a local entity. Omnipresent offers hassle-free onboarding to global payroll services, comprehensive global benefits administration, compliance adherence, and they handle complex tax matters. The holistic approach helps to ensure the user's remote… | N/A |
| Lano | Omnipresent | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Lano | Omnipresent | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 81% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 81% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 89% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 16 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 94% Implementation went as expected 17 Answers | |
| Lano | Omnipresent | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 7.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.2 |
| Usability | - | 8.4 |
| Availability | - | 3.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.3 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 7.3 |
| Configurability | - | 1.0 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 3.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 3.0 |
| Professional Services | - | 4.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 7.0 |
| Lano | Omnipresent | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Professional Services | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Omnipresent Screenshots |



