KYRO is a unified construction management software that helps businesses bridge office teams with field crews on construction sites. Field crew members can utilize the voice notes functionality to record the day's updates in any language and share it instantly with reporting managers. The platform enables administrators to generate daily reports regarding expenditures, and invoices generated. Managers can use the optical character recognition (OCR) functionality to…
$95
per month per user
monday.com
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
monday.com Work OS is an open platform designed so that anyone can create the tools they need to run all aspects of their work. It includes ready-made templates or the ability to customize any work solution ranging from sales pipelines to marketing campaigns, CRMs, and project tracking.
$12
per month per user
Pricing
KYRO
monday.com
Editions & Modules
GROWTH
$95
per month per user
Basic
$12
per month per user
Standard
$14
per month per user
Pro
$24
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Contact us
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KYRO
monday.com
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
**Kyro charges by the license or by the number of projects executed per year. Both pricing models require a minimum commitment of 50 (either licenses per month or projects per year). 20% discount for annual pricing.
Yearly plan: Save 18%
Monthly plan also available
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KYRO
monday.com
Features
KYRO
monday.com
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
KYRO
5.8
Ratings
27% below category average
monday.com
-
Ratings
Organization and location management
5.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
KYRO
5.8
Ratings
27% below category average
monday.com
-
Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
5.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
KYRO
5.2
Ratings
38% below category average
monday.com
-
Ratings
Dashboards
5.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
5.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
5.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
KYRO
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
monday.com
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
5.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
7.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
As-built drawings
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Checklists
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change orders
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
KYRO
-
Ratings
monday.com
8.9
Ratings
15% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
9.40 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
I find KYRO to be an exceptionally well-designed product, ideally suited for both large and relatively smaller teams. Its ability to facilitate collaboration among multiple stakeholders on documents and plans is particularly impressive, making it an indispensable tool in managing diverse and complex construction projects. I appreciate KYRO's effectiveness in scenarios that demand meticulous tracking of labor hours and monitoring project progress to adhere to budget constraints. I perceive KYRO to be less suited for smaller residential projects that don't necessitate its extensive range of features. In such cases, simpler tools may suffice for effective management, making KYRO's advanced capabilities somewhat excessive for these smaller-scale projects.
Here, I will suggest that it is best to create employees, clients, or project reports. Easy to track with the dashboards. I did many integrations and developments. I can not list each of them here. I will say the best tool for management. I couldn't see criteria of unsuitable. But yes It will depend on the client's requirements. I will suggest it as very user-friendly tool for CEOs, CTOs, Managers, and company owners also for team.
Document Management: As a project manager, I've found KYRO's document management feature to be a game-changer. The ability to organize all project-related documents in one centralized location simplifies the workflow significantly. Their search functionality works well, allowing for quick and easy retrieval of documents from an extensive archive. This feature not only saves time but also enhances the overall efficiency of document handling in our projects
Time Management: The timesheet feature of KYRO has been instrumental in streamlining the process of recording and approving work hours. This functionality has been pivotal in efficiently tracking the hours logged by my crew, greatly aiding in effective time management and workforce coordination.
Ensuring I have set up a Private board vs public board is not clear - it would be useful to have an additional alert when creating a board as I work with sensitive information. It will eventually be used in a team based environment but while I test the boards, they needs to be private.
Time tracking is clumsy, could be easier to record
Teams involved in content creation, such as marketing or editorial teams, could use monday.com to manage the entire content lifecycle. Boards might track content ideas, assignments, drafts, reviews, approvals, and publication schedules, helping teams collaborate and keep content production on track.
It's straightforward to use and simple to understand. They have tutorials on different elements of the system that you can learn. The workflow there is very intuitive, drag and drop, which doesn't require a learning curve for most people. Templates that also make things more accessible can be found.
Everything performs fairly well. Every now and then there are user errors where an employee will not click "ok" on a note they've created and simply exit out (I do wish that something was in place to prevent this, such as a pop "are you finished?")
monday.com only really care about accounts that have 20 seats or more. While this is great for monday.com, it pushes smaller organisations to evaluate alternatives. We rate monday.com highly in our organisation because key staff have already got good experience with the application and we know we will get to 20+ seats one day. But, till then the billing model and lack of permanent enterprise features is a dread.
To have someone walk you thru the features and capabilities of Monday.com is priceless. Someone also coming along later in the contract to see if you are maximizing the program to suit your company needs is beyond helpful. The staff that have provided this training are fun, creative and very patient.
We signed up for the accounts. Created the accounts. Ran the trial version and tested it live while we were running multiple projects and found that it was fitting our needs perfectly. When the trial ended and we were asked to purchase the full version, we did. We have found other ways to use it and it's a breeze.
We decided to go with monday.com because they offered a free tier for nonprofits and because they are easier to use and offered additional features that we could not find on the other choices. Hands down, there was no better choice for us than monday.com.
For it to work across multiple departments and sites, I would like to see improvements made with integrations and automation. For this question, I am acknowledging not only the addition of internal triggers/automation, but also an expansion on external ones.
KYRO has led to a significant reduction in man-hours. The platform has been instrumental in tracking progress across various projects, and it has also streamlined administrative tasks, eliminating the need for manual approvals
I've found KYRO extremely effective in reducing errors during report submissions for both daily logs and forms. Its system maintains a record of previous entries, which serves as a reference for future submissions.
By using monday.com as an enablement tool for templated onboarding plans, we have been able to begin calculating the number of manager hours saved through our work (not defined yet).
monday.com's reporting tools also allow us to more easily report on the productivity and output of our team since we keep up with all projects and subitems in monday.com.