KwikTag vs. Tungsten Capture

Works fine for accounting but we've found workflow capabilities are limited for those who aren't using our accounting system. License seats need to be concurrent instead of user specific.

Incentivized

If there is a desire to extract text from emails, documents, spreadsheets, and faxes this is the perfect platform for that. The only thing it does, extracting information, it does well. External information in terms of flat files, databases, and web services can be tied into the platform as well to allow line item matching, address validation, and other features that make it just an overall great ingestion system.

Incentivized

• Helps keep track of multiple vendors' receipts and invoices.
• The integration with GP accounting is particularly helpful and it's why we chose the system.
• Users find the system easy to understand.

Incentivized

• One of the things we relied on Kofax was its connector with Oracle UCM and Filenet. It was easy to configure batch classes and set up release scripts to UCM or Filent
• One other aspect of it was validation scripts based on external Oracle databases. It was very helpful.
• After removal of dongle, it became easier to maintain the software.

Incentivized

• It would be nice if we could automatically email invoices from KwikTag to responsible parties for approval.
• Need to provide a web interface that doesn't use up a license seat so other members than KwikTag users can view documents that go with what's been charged to their budget.

Incentivized

• Kofax Capture's interface is antiquated and could use a refresh. An attempt was made two versions back to add ribbons and modernize the interface but anything below the first level looks and feels like a tired application.
• Bugs that have existed in the platform for years are still prevalent and there is no priority to fix them. Features and critical bugs are regularly fixed but simple nagging ones that can cause a development project to close and lose all work is commonplace.
• Licensing, while reasonable for lower volume solutions, becomes expensive once a project reaches a certain threshold. Ensure future planning capacity is done before purchasing to make sure it's a cost effective solution.

Incentivized

Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.

Incentivized

It's good.

Incentivized

Haven't really used their support yet

Incentivized

We use Laserfiche for our legal and membership services departments. Laserfiche is a full blown workflow and document management system that runs on our own SQL server. Therefore we have much more control of how it's set up and we can customize it more easily.

Incentivized

Kofax Capture was less expensive than the IBM product and was easier to use than both IBM and Amazon in my opinion. The unlimited scripting of Kofax Capture allowed us to fully integrate the tool into our business processes to improve our automation and reduce errors. We also looked at a product from Nuance but at the time decided to eliminate it from our evaluation.

Incentivized

• KwikTag has taken a large burden off our AP staff.
• Documents are readily available for retrieval without having to scan through directories full of files or boxes of paper.
• Would like to see the ability for others to at least search and view documents.

Incentivized

• We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.

Incentivized