EasyQA vs. Kualitee

The complexity of the product is too high, so even changes to a single feature impact many other functionalities. Using EasyQA has helped us create multiple test cases where the feature may have its effects and test and track the progress on as many related functionalities as possible.

Incentivized

From a business standpoint, features such as test scenarios, test cases, bug logging, and then graphical representations of every minute detail related to task and projects are very satisfying and productive. We can keep track of literally everything with Kualitee, and our quality is improving. One downside is that we cannot change the visualisations of some graphs. I believe that by giving the user more customisation options, such as filtering out on the basis of days and months, the experience could be greatly improved.

Incentivized

• Creation of test cases for new features
• Management of created bugs
• Bug tracking and analysis

Incentivized

• Import and Export
• Integration with other tools
• Regression and Blackbox testing

Incentivized

• In my experience, they provide poor support
• The application is still a bit buggy

Incentivized

• Support response time
• Should have dark mode
• Response time for API call

Incentivized

TestRail is very costly and complex compared to Kualitee

Incentivized

• If the terminology ( Test Scenarios, modules, components ) is not used in your workflow, it may take some time to set up properly because you must figure out how these are defined by your own terminology to get the hierarchy correct

Incentivized