Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) vs. Kubernetes

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
KVM
Score 2.2 out of 10
N/A
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) is a virtualization solution developed by small Israeli software company Qumranet and supported by Red Hat since that company's acquisition in 2008.N/A
Kubernetes
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Kubernetes is an open-source container cluster manager.N/A
Pricing
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)Kubernetes
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KVMKubernetes
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)Kubernetes
Features
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)Kubernetes
Server Virtualization
Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)
9.2
5 Ratings
12% above category average
Kubernetes
-
Ratings
Virtual machine automated provisioning9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Management console9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Live virtual machine backup9.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Live virtual machine migration9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Hypervisor-level security9.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)
-
Ratings
Kubernetes
8.4
3 Ratings
8% above category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
Container Orchestration00 Ratings9.53 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings9.53 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings7.53 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)Kubernetes
Small Businesses
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 8.7 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(5 ratings)
9.5
(18 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
KVM is the best solution in the case you need to test and turn up any virtual environment with limited vCPU/RAM resources. The obvious area of its use is a network environment when we want to avoid being tied to one type of hardware/vendor and being able to swap from one instance to another with no downtimes. The use of a vSwitch (that supports VLAN tagging) is a significant bonus for network engineers that some other hypervisors do not provide.
Read full review
Kubernetes
K8s should be avoided - If your application works well without being converted into microservices-based architecture & fits correctly in a VM, needs less scaling, have a fixed traffic pattern then it is better to keep away from Kubernetes. Otherwise, the operational challenges & technical expertise will add a lot to the OPEX. Also, if you're the one who thinks that containers consume fewer resources as compared to VMs then this is not true. As soon as you convert your application to a microservice-based architecture, a lot of components will add up, shooting your resource consumption even higher than VMs so, please beware. Kubernetes is a good choice - When the application needs quick scaling, is already in microservice-based architecture, has no fixed traffic pattern, most of the employees already have desired skills.
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • KVM is really good at providing fast and reliable virtualization for Linux guests
  • Since KVM is a kernel module, every VM is a Linux process which can be managed by Linux system tools
  • KVM integrates very well with the management framework libvirt, which is why KVM can be integrated in automation tools as well
Read full review
Kubernetes
  • Complex cluster management can be done with simple commands with strong authentication and authorization schemes
  • Exhaustive documentation and open community smoothens the learning process
  • As a user a few concepts like pod, deployment and service are sufficient to go a long way
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • KVM itself doesn't ship with a management interface
  • KVM itself is a bit complicated to handle
  • KVM needs Qemu to virtualize Windows guests
Read full review
Kubernetes
  • Local development, Kubernetes does tend to be a bit complicated and unnecessary in environments where all development is done locally.
  • The need for add-ons, Helm is almost required when running Kubernetes. This brings a whole new tool to manage and learn before a developer can really start to use Kubernetes effectively.
  • Finicy configmap schemes. Kubernetes configmaps often have environment breaking hangups. The fail safes surrounding configmaps are sadly lacking.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Kubernetes
The Kubernetes is going to be highly likely renewed as the technologies that will be placed on top of it are long term as of planning. There shouldn't be any last minute changes in the adoption and I do not anticipate sudden change of the core underlying technology. It is just that the slow process of technology adoption that makes it hard to switch to something else.
Read full review
Usability
Red Hat
It does the job and stays out of the way. The specifics of usability relies on the implementation, but with things like Icarus and libvirt, things are standardizing nicely.
Read full review
Kubernetes
It is an eminently usable platform. However, its popularity is overshadowed by its complexity. To properly leverage the capabilities and possibilities of Kubernetes as a platform, you need to have excellent understanding of your use case, even better understanding of whether you even need Kubernetes, and if yes - be ready to invest in good engineering support for the platform itself
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
It is a very reliable solution that can be used for x86 architecture virtualization with low overhead. It is a free and open source software. Easy to use withOpenStack.
Read full review
Kubernetes
Most of the required features for any orchestration tool or framework, which is provided by Kubernetes. After understanding all modules and features of the K8S, it is the best fit for us as compared with others out there.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • Fast provisioning of new servers.
  • Huge drop of the cost of servers compared to bare metal.
  • Easy upgrades of resources, sometimes now even requiring a server restart.
Read full review
Kubernetes
  • Because of microservices, Kubernetes makes it easy to find the cost of each application easily.
  • Like every new technology, initially, it took more resources to educate ourselves but over a period of time, I believe it's going to be worth it.
Read full review
ScreenShots