TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Kaspersky Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Kaspersky Endpoint Security

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AKaspersky Small Office Security (formerly Kaspersky Work Space Security) is antivirus / endpoint security software from Russian company Kaspersky.

    $29.99

    per month

    Symantec Endpoint Security

    Score6.1 out of 10
    N/ASymantec Endpoint Protection is the company's flagship antivirus / endpoint security product.

    $29.99

    per year 100-249 devices

    Pricing
    Kaspersky Endpoint SecuritySymantec Endpoint Security
    Editions & Modules
    Essential Suite
    $29.99
    per month
    Advanced Suite
    $39.99
    per month
    Premium Suite
    $44.99
    per month
    Endpoint Security, Initial Hybrid Subscription License With Support
    $29.99
    1 year 100-249 devices
    Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, Initial Hybrid Subscription License with Support
    $34.99
    1 year 1-99 devices
    Endpoint Security, Initial Hybrid Subscription License With Support
    $90.99
    3 years 100-249 devices
    Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, Initial Hybrid Subscription License with Support
    $99.99
    3 years 1-99 devices
    Symantec Endpoint Security Complete, Initial Hybrid Subscription License with Support
    $200
    3 years 1-99 devices
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Kaspersky Endpoint SecuritySymantec Endpoint Security
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Kaspersky Endpoint SecuritySymantec Endpoint Security
    Considered Both Products
    Kaspersky Lab
    Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security
    More performing and better protection.
    Incentivized
    Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security
    The Central Security Center for the Symantec Endpoint Protection product that was previously being used was horrible and the client programs were a huge drain on system resources. The workstation resources were overloaded when this program was running and rendered the …
    Incentivized
    Broadcom
    Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
    I have worked on many antivirus tools, but according to my opinion, this is a stable and reliable product.
    Incentivized
    Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
    Symantec Endpoint Security offers very similar features to the above products, they all do the same thing in terms of protecting your endpoints against cybersecurity threats. Installation wise the products all install from a central management system and report back to this for …
    Incentivized
    Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
    In comparison with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Symantec Endpoint Security has, in my opinion, more scalable file inspection/spyware/antivirus settings. Plus it is more stable in a multi-OS user environment. But it also has numerous issues with itself and related Symantec …
    Incentivized
    Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
    Symantec Endpoint Protection outperformed all other competitor front-line antivirus products with more accurate signature detections and less false positives. We ultimately chose to pair SEP with Malwarebytes Anti-Malware to provide a more comprehensive security solution that …
    Incentivized
    Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
    I actually didn't make the decision to go with Symantec at all. It was already in place when I started working at my current employer, and we have not yet had the opportunity to replace it. I replaced it at my two previous employers with Sophos Endpoint Protection, which was …
    Incentivized
    Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
    Symantec Endpoint Protection stacks up to the competition very nicely. It does have all the features of the competition except the licensing model is a lot cheaper than the other products. For our large scale environment, it allowed us to effectively manage a high volume of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
    Symantec is well trusted, firmly solid, and a well all-round solution.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    86%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    83%
    Would buy again
    20 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    86%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    90%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    23 Answers
    Features
    Kaspersky Endpoint SecuritySymantec Endpoint Security
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security and Symantec Endpoint Security
    Feature
    Kaspersky Endpoint Security
    8.3
    13 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Symantec Endpoint Security
    9.2
    36 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Anti-Exploit Technology9.013 Ratings8.930 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)8.013 Ratings9.933 Ratings
    Centralized Management8.012 Ratings8.934 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support7.09 Ratings8.825 Ratings
    Infection Remediation8.013 Ratings7.934 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management9.013 Ratings9.831 Ratings
    Malware Detection9.013 Ratings9.934 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Kaspersky Endpoint SecuritySymantec Endpoint Security
    Small Businesses
    Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Watchguard Endpoint Security
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Watchguard Endpoint Security
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ESET PROTECT
    Score9.1 out of 10
    ESET PROTECT
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Kaspersky Endpoint SecuritySymantec Endpoint Security
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (26 ratings)
    9.7
    (63 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    1.0
    (11 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Kaspersky Endpoint SecuritySymantec Endpoint Security
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Kaspersky Lab
    I think Kaspersky is well suited for large and small companies. Larger companies can take advantage of the KSC (Kaspersky Security Center) servers to help manage a large network. The KSC has many good features to help monitor the health of the organization. It does a good job with updating and deploying remotely. It has inventory features, and can even deploy non-Kaspersky software packages uploaded to the center. KSC can become a source of good information about [your] network that can be seen at a glance. IT departments are normally smaller than they need to be. KSC helps with larger and smaller companies because of this. A small company would appreciate the amount of information and management that can be done through KSC without needing extra help. If the company is small enough that they don't have servers on-site, there is a cloud version. I have not used that to know how it differs from the local KSC.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    Symantec Endpoint Security is a well-rounded product that provides a significant amount of functionality and covers many of our endpoint needs without needing to resort to multiple vendors that might clash in unpredictable ways when ultimately deployed to the endpoints in our estate. The default policies are adequate and tuning these requires some time as with all similar EDR products but the product is flexible enough to allow very granular whitelisting/blacklisting which is great. Low resource requirements are also fantastic and we've not had many complaints from developers who were getting slowed down when compiling complex code with other previous solutions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Kaspersky Lab
    • The Security Center is laid out very well and makes it easy to install and manage the client endpoint protection on servers and workstations.
    • The way security policies are defined and managed is very easy to understand.
    • The client programs seem to be lighter and smaller on the client systems than others I have used in the past. Using fewer resources is always an advantage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • The virus and spyware protection has worked well for us, catching several things and quarantining the items or cleaning them.
    • The virus definitions very rarely fail to update for the users, so I feel confident that my client machines are kept up to date.
    • I like the report I get daily telling me about threats found and action taken without having to login to the console to look it up myself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Kaspersky Lab
    • The PC imaging tools are difficult to set up and use
    • Device Encryption tools are getting better, but are difficult to manage.
    • The policies are powerful, but could be broken up. More help can be provided in what the policy element does within the policy setup
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • The system should have a better ability to auto repair, if an item is malfunctioning it should auto reinstall.
    • The cloud platform and the server do not talk well to each other and it would be great to get the same data on both platforms, this may be due to version though.
    • It seems the whitelisting on the cloud platform could use some work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Kaspersky Lab
    The product is stable and accurate in detecting security threats. There are very few or no false positives in detecting security threats or unusual behavior and has very sharp heuristics. The product does the job very well including saving us money in getting 3rd party patch management tools as the business is already using Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager which is Microsoft product specific and the product patches these third party products e.g Adobe Flash Player
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    Best of Breed. Symantec Endpoint Protection beats all other end point products I have used, tested and seen in presentation at this point in time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Kaspersky Lab
    I will give Kaspersky a score of 9 out of 10 for scalability, as it allows businesses to easily expand their security infrastructure. This means it won't cost them a lot to add further protection and security. It won't also require them to purchase other hardware and services for their required protection.
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    The rating reflects Symantec Endpoint Security's ability to balance enterprise grade security with user-friendly workflows or advanced configurations require extra effort. For most organizations, the streamlined management and robust automation justify the high score. Management GUI is old fashined and need to be improve. Older devices may experience slowdowns during full scans without careful configuration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Kaspersky Lab
    I've used the on-premise server. I've only experienced one time that we couldn't open the console, and that was a server issue. It seems to be a dependable solution. It's there, and it's stable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    We've used it for years and the software is easy to use. The dashboard is easy to read, and you can easily figure out where to go to troubleshoot or deploy software. Symantec is there for emergencies like backup restoration or file retrieval. It's pretty low maintenance. Symantec is there when your IT infrastructure needs it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Kaspersky Lab
    Users don't notice any slowdown with the antivirus running on their systems. There have been issues when the systems have missed a scheduled scan, and it was checked to run at [a] first available time, they will start a full scan at startup. This has caused some lag. Normally there are also some issues with the workstation, but it is something to note.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Kaspersky Lab
    I give the maximum grade because we have no complaints; we never had any failure, serious error, and serious threat to the company. All of its features work very well. The great advantage of having a product supported by an industry-leading security company is that regularly updated security protocols will protect the system against all emerging threats.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    Support is completely awful! You can never get anyone to help if you can even find a number to call. The support web portal is a joke and their response time if you're even able to submit a ticket is ridiculously slow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Kaspersky Lab
    Make sure to provide awareness campaigns on changes that will be implemented and WHY the business is doing it and the benefits reaped. Benefits reaped is very important for the justification of why things have to change and emphasizing the importance of security. This will reduce user disgruntlement and total bitterness on use of their workstation or laptop
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    Use a third party deployment tool and not the deployment option within the SEP Manager itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Kaspersky Lab
    Kaspersky is a leader in endpoint protection, but its ties to potential adversaries are unsettling. Kaspersky has a great threat research team and quickly identifies malicious software and its signature. Its web-based protection is also top notch. This is a great product but as with everything has its place.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    Symantec Endpoint Security offers very similar features to the above products, they all do the same thing in terms of protecting your endpoints against cybersecurity threats. Installation wise the products all install from a central management system and report back to this for central reporting. Ultimately we choose Symantec as the reseller was able to offer additional incentives which made their pricing very competitive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Kaspersky Lab
    You can create groups and create different policies for each group. You can customize many parts of the software before it is deployed. You can create different tasks and schedules based on the groups. It is customizable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Kaspersky Lab
    • It reduced the incidents of infections and so reduced the efforts needed by the IT department to mitigate problems.
    • It made it difficult to manage the security of our growing mobile user base due to infrequent contact with our on-premise management server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • The ROI from deploying this has led to fewer security issues which reduces costs.
    • Keeping track of security issues and how the were remedied is easier.
    • Deskside support can work with end users easily if something is triggered and this allows us to not have to overstaff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots