Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution was a cloud-based ERP solution for university process management. Jenzabar now offers Jenzabar ONE as their higher ed solution.
N/A
M1
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
M1, from ECI Software Solutions headquartered in Ft. Worth, is an all-in-one manufacturing ERP software solution, built for small and medium-sized discrete manufacturers.
N/A
Pricing
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
M1
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
M1
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
M1
Features
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
M1
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
6.0
Ratings
18% below category average
M1
5.6
Ratings
25% below category average
Pay calculation
6.00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.00 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
4.60 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
3.5
Ratings
74% below category average
M1
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
API for custom integration
6.00 Ratings
7.60 Ratings
Plug-ins
1.00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
M1
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Single sign-on capability
8.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.00 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
6.0
Ratings
18% below category average
M1
6.5
Ratings
10% below category average
Dashboards
1.00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Standard reports
8.00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Custom reports
9.00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
M1
6.9
Ratings
11% below category average
Accounts payable
8.00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Accounts receivable
8.00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
-
Ratings
M1
7.0
Ratings
12% below category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
-
Ratings
M1
7.3
Ratings
7% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
-
Ratings
M1
6.5
Ratings
14% below category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
-
Ratings
M1
5.2
Ratings
27% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
5.40 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
4.60 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
-
Ratings
M1
2.7
Ratings
93% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
2.70 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
-
Ratings
M1
6.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
-
Ratings
M1
4.9
Ratings
28% below category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
3.80 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
3.80 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
-
Ratings
M1
4.0
Ratings
50% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
2.20 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
2.50 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
4.70 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
4.90 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
5.50 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
-
Ratings
M1
6.6
Ratings
12% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
-
Ratings
M1
5.6
Ratings
24% below category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
4.70 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
-
Ratings
M1
4.4
Ratings
47% below category average
Proposal Management
00 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), discontinued
M1
Likelihood to Recommend
Any school that has Jenzabar database as their CRM will benefit from having Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS) also included in the environment. Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS) gives a reasonable interface to present the information stored in the database to the student and also gives the student the ability to register and change their courses online.Also, with bills being online, you don't have to print and mail the bills out to students.
Implementation is by far the weakest link in the ECI/M1 process. Although the tool is powerful, the client is expected to drive the process of learning the tool, planning the meetings with consultants, identifying risks and making mitigation plans, etc. without any samples, guidance or assistance on the part of ECI. The tool is best suited to high volume, standard product manufacturers who build to inventory or to order without much variation. The shop floor routing and time tracking are straightforward if you can master the convoluted Unit Of Measure calculations. The tool is either hosted locally or accessed through Remote Desktop. Shop floor is web enabled but the main desktop for M1 is still a relay which makes connectivity a potential issue. Moving this platform to a truly web hosted environment would substantially improve connectivity and eliminate compatibility issues with Apple products
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS) is good at interacting with the Jenzabar database.
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS) can integrate with Active Directory to allow for one set of credentials and also has its own credential management system for local accounts to be created.
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS) will display grades as soon as they are entered into the Jenzabar database.
Manage inventory counts. Good precision on quantities in and out, through shipping, MI, MR, and receipts.
Job costing shows great details on labor, operations, and materials to be used. I wished that would do better in outside operations that would return, but we still think it is great.
Ability to track changes (changelog), showing all changes that had in a particular place. Such as where, when, and by whom a line item unit price was changed in a PO.
Link, traceability, keeping history. If done correctly, it is amazing to keep the history of a part/lot.
The amount of user rights/customization is unbelievable. It can be hard to set up in the beginning, but it is great that you can give some very specific access to a user, and it is not (in general) as a package.
Jenzabar is unwilling to work with other companies to integrate information across multiple platforms.
The quality of JICS is contingent upon appropriate use and entry by those on campus. While not a limitation to JICS itself, there seems to be more problems with JICS in this regard than I have noticed on other campuses with other platforms.
JICS is typically behind on the times. Features it adds today were commonplace for others much earlier.
Some of the functions are pretty detailed - and so they take a while to generate screens and pages in reports.
We actually use it for 2 companies we own - and it would be nice if the inter company communication was a little smoother. It's hard to share some data, and not everything is possible to be shared.
Customized reports need to backed up before any updates to M1 or they're lost. It seems M1 overwrites the report folders everytime you run an update - so you have to keep track of what you've changed in Crystal Reports and restore it.
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS) is very usable and easy to maintain. With us having students log in with their AD credentials, they don't have to remember an extra username and password. Also, I have been able to update and customize some of the coding, which has allowed us to make sure the site works just the way we want it to.
Because it would be helpful if ECI would provide better documentation, communication and workflows to understand how each field interacts within the system and how each of those touch other areas within M1. It would also be useful if ECI would provide prescheduled training for how to customize things with M1 through Design Studio
Support is generally very helpful. There are some support staff that really try to go the extra mile and help with solving the problem you have, not just answering your initial question. If you don't understand a feature that is offered in the Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS) environment, they also have a portal with on-demand webinars/courses that you can watch to get a better idea of offerings at your own base.
We selected JICS many years ago as it was a cost-effective option that was streamlined and straight-forward. Today, no one is ever thrilled with their SIS, and I can anticipate major difficulties if we attempted to move from JICS. However, from a features and revolutionary standpoint, I do feel we will always be a step behind if we continue with Jenzabar.
Our customization requirements were not that high and based on a price/cost benefit M1 was the winner. SAP was considered but the upfront costs and challenging learning curve together with the lack of flexibility in the SAP HANA public cloud version made the M1 choice more natural. SAP Services is usually more expensive compared to M1.