ConstructConnect retains the iSqFt brand after merging the company; the platform is ConstructConnect's bidding and digital take off platform focused on helping construction contractors and companies locate bids and earn jobs.
N/A
monday.com
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
monday.com Work OS is an open platform designed so that anyone can create the tools they need to run all aspects of their work. It includes ready-made templates or the ability to customize any work solution ranging from sales pipelines to marketing campaigns, CRMs, and project tracking.
$12
per month per user
Pricing
iSqFt
monday.com
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$12
per month per user
Standard
$14
per month per user
Pro
$24
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Contact us
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
iSqFt
monday.com
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Yearly plan: Save 18%
Monthly plan also available
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
iSqFt
monday.com
Features
iSqFt
monday.com
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
iSqFt
8.7
Ratings
14% above category average
monday.com
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
As-built drawings
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Submittal design and management
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
7.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
iSqFt
9.8
Ratings
20% above category average
monday.com
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job costing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost databases
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost calculator
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bid creation
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
iSqFt
-
Ratings
monday.com
8.9
Ratings
15% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
9.40 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
9.40 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
I have noticed that many projects listed on iSqFt do not have all of the project details required to accurately bid a project. It would be nice if they had a vetting process that would required customers to upload certain documents and confirm they have certain information beofre placing the job out to bid through their platform.
Here, I will suggest that it is best to create employees, clients, or project reports. Easy to track with the dashboards. I did many integrations and developments. I can not list each of them here. I will say the best tool for management. I couldn't see criteria of unsuitable. But yes It will depend on the client's requirements. I will suggest it as very user-friendly tool for CEOs, CTOs, Managers, and company owners also for team.
Even with a "Limited Access" free account, you are able to see all the necessary files. When using it to just look at a job and download documents, this is all you should need. With more access you can see more projects that are out to bid but as a sales engineer for a manufacturer, I receive the bid requests from my contractors who are bidding there is no need to upgrade my access level.
Documents are very easy to download into a .zip file and you can pick and choose which documents you want to download for specific trades. Plus there is a specific tab for Addenda so you don't have to search through the Documents tab. The tabs also show the amount of files in each tab so you can easily stay up to date on current documents.
The Dashboard of each job shows the project general contractor and for subcontractors, responding to a bid request is as easy as clicking a button to indicate if you will bud or will not bid. This dashboard also shows location and the project description which are particularly helpful for a manufacturers rep/sales engineer that may not see the project description otherwise.
iSqFt has one major flaw that makes it a pain to use. I go there to get plans and specs. You think a company that sends you plans and specs would have a faster download speed, it takes forever to get the plans and specs. I usually find a way around iSqFt to get the plans and specs.
Ensuring I have set up a Private board vs public board is not clear - it would be useful to have an additional alert when creating a board as I work with sensitive information. It will eventually be used in a team based environment but while I test the boards, they needs to be private.
Time tracking is clumsy, could be easier to record
Teams involved in content creation, such as marketing or editorial teams, could use monday.com to manage the entire content lifecycle. Boards might track content ideas, assignments, drafts, reviews, approvals, and publication schedules, helping teams collaborate and keep content production on track.
It's straightforward to use and simple to understand. They have tutorials on different elements of the system that you can learn. The workflow there is very intuitive, drag and drop, which doesn't require a learning curve for most people. Templates that also make things more accessible can be found.
Everything performs fairly well. Every now and then there are user errors where an employee will not click "ok" on a note they've created and simply exit out (I do wish that something was in place to prevent this, such as a pop "are you finished?")
I have never had a problem with support from the iSqFt team. They are continually reaching out with tips and tricks to make using their software easier. Anytime I've had a problem - which is seldom - they have been extremely prompt with their response on how to fix it.
monday.com only really care about accounts that have 20 seats or more. While this is great for monday.com, it pushes smaller organisations to evaluate alternatives. We rate monday.com highly in our organisation because key staff have already got good experience with the application and we know we will get to 20+ seats one day. But, till then the billing model and lack of permanent enterprise features is a dread.
To have someone walk you thru the features and capabilities of Monday.com is priceless. Someone also coming along later in the contract to see if you are maximizing the program to suit your company needs is beyond helpful. The staff that have provided this training are fun, creative and very patient.
We signed up for the accounts. Created the accounts. Ran the trial version and tested it live while we were running multiple projects and found that it was fitting our needs perfectly. When the trial ended and we were asked to purchase the full version, we did. We have found other ways to use it and it's a breeze.
iSqFt is a solid competitor in the bidding/estimating platform world but as a user, Building Connected is the front runner. iSqFt lacks on the collaboration side and isn't as easy to use and access as its competitors. Building Connected is used by most of our clients so it's easier to use because there is more information in one place.
We decided to go with monday.com because they offered a free tier for nonprofits and because they are easier to use and offered additional features that we could not find on the other choices. Hands down, there was no better choice for us than monday.com.
For it to work across multiple departments and sites, I would like to see improvements made with integrations and automation. For this question, I am acknowledging not only the addition of internal triggers/automation, but also an expansion on external ones.
By using monday.com as an enablement tool for templated onboarding plans, we have been able to begin calculating the number of manager hours saved through our work (not defined yet).
monday.com's reporting tools also allow us to more easily report on the productivity and output of our team since we keep up with all projects and subitems in monday.com.