Ironclad, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is designed to streamline every part of the contract process—so users can focus on legal work, not paperwork.
N/A
Smart Contract Management
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
FPX offers Smart Contract Management for automating contracts.
N/A
Pricing
Ironclad
Smart Contract Management by FPX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ironclad
Smart Contract Management
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ironclad
Smart Contract Management by FPX
Features
Ironclad
Smart Contract Management by FPX
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
Ironclad
5.3
Ratings
40% below category average
Smart Contract Management by FPX
-
Ratings
Contract creation
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract templates
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Guided logic
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Ironclad
10.0
Ratings
19% above category average
Smart Contract Management by FPX
-
Ratings
Contract sharing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract editing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
MS Word plug-in
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Approval process
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Ironclad
4.6
Ratings
57% below category average
Smart Contract Management by FPX
-
Ratings
Contract database
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract search
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom contract reports
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tracking contract status
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance check
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
I think it worked realllly well at my previous company where we used it for a very simple form that just required one simple signature from both sides- this was a form used to record custom pricing/discounts for a product that typically was not discounted. In my current role, there are many more required fields on the form/contract, and can be multiple levels of approvals on one side, and then possibly multiple levels of approvals/signatures on the other side. I've never used another solution in the exact same way (like DocuSign) to be able to compare experiences, but on Ironclad, understanding where I am in the completion process can be confusing. Within the app, I wish it was more of just a checklist or schedule of what needs to happen, but it's not written out that clearly. Lastly, there is something wrong with our notifications (I'm not sure if this is specific to my company's settings)- I frequently get 'contract completed' or 'contract signed' email notifications even if that hasn't occurred. They seem to correlate with updating the form or refreshing the sync from SFDC.
I think it does all the things I need, and it can be simple to use, but it can also be confusing and not intuitive the more functionality you take advantage of. I am especially frustrated by false "form completed" notifications that I receive not only when forms have actually been completed, but also when they've been refreshed from SFDC or otherwise updated.
I haven't used the support services for IronClad, but I understand from our legal team, the support is very good, they have replied and provide solutions quickly and effectively. I have used the documentation and support pages which are very complete and which have been updated given the user interface updates.
IronClad is a comprehensive platform that allows legal teams, cross functional teams and approvers to keep track of the suggestions and changes made to legal agreements. It keeps everything in a single place, however it lacks the simplicity and practicality of DocuSign throughout the signing process, so we usually have to use both platforms to complete a legal workforce