Intellect QMS vs. Verint Automated Quality Management

This is a great platform for a small but quickly growing organization. It works well out of the box without a lot of bells and whistles but can be configured for specific needs. Migrating "legacy" processes, data and culture requires a lot of up front training but is worth the effort. Customer support is top-notch, and a single administrator can manage multiple applications

Incentivized

Getting a view of all calls and a good pool of calls is the automated qualities strong suite. It can validate and score anything that is within he applicable rule set. Usually, AQM is good for answering yes/no questions, would like to see some functionality around call segments or actions like hold

Incentivized

• The applications are linked to each other so that activities can be shared, collaborated and escalated in one platform.
• Applications are sufficient "out of the box" but can be configured easily with its intuitive Design tools.
• Users can go to their personal dashboard to stay on top of their tasks across multiple applications and monitor status of activities in progress.
• The workflow-based applications keep activities moving forward efficiently but following standard processes.

Incentivized

• Agent Score Cards
• Advise when agents need coaching / additional training
• Enable 100% scaling of call / interaction monitoring
• Reduce resources needed to otherwise manually review agents.

Incentivized

• Although the configuration is a "no code" approach, there is a learning curve to effecting design changes.
• The user guide documentation provided is OK for administrators but needs to be more user-friendly for general users.
• Importing "legacy" data from existing processes can be cumbersome.

Incentivized

• Layering in additional conditions into questions could probably be improved slightly. A lot of time is being spent on rebuilds and customizing additional layers of questioning.

Incentivized

There is always resistance to change, but users are finding Intellect QMS to exceed their expectations as we migrate from our legacy "island" Sharepoint-based processes. Training is actually easiest to do hands-on, and users can learn quickly and then help train others. Users appreciate the personal navigation dashboard and the familiarity of the interface from one application to another. The workflow-driven applications are intuitive and make the system easy to navigate for all levels of users, although the learning curves will vary. The "Design-Test-Live" approach facilitates the implementation of configuration changes suggested by users.

Incentivized

Access cannot be restricted in the form designer at the form level. In order to give admin access for AQM it opens up access to all form. In a company with multiple organizations, we wouldn't want others to be able to modify forms.

Incentivized

No comparison with the huge improvement Intellect is compared to the software we were using in the past. Night and Day difference.

Incentivized

We did not know how to use it effectively at first so we got extra training but it doesn't really help us where we spend the most time evaluating quality - on procedural/technical accuracy.

Incentivized

• Users appreciate the time and effort saved by having all of the QMS functions connected and in one place, without having to rely on emails, Sharepoint links multiple modes of communication to keep track of their activities and responsibilities.
• The no-code platform means we don't need IT support to maintain and configure the applications. One administrator was able to get the system launched and effective in just several weeks, with ongoing training and customization as users and applications are added.
• Our organization was recently certified to ISO 9001:2015. Intellect QMS helped us to navigate internal and audits confidently and effectively.

Incentivized

• We had another product that we decommissioned so we have been without AQM for 9 months now
• Negative, Still not up and running as expected

Incentivized