InRule vs. Progress Corticon Business Rules Engine

InRule is suitable for when your business rules need to change on a daily basis and you want the flexibility for your commercial team to take the ownership and drive results, without dependency on development teams. It also suited for when you want to quickly prototype new business logic without going through development cycles. It is also suited when you want to have the simplicity in the system so that even managers can jump in and help if needed.

Incentivized

Suited for any place where complex business rules need to be separated for ease of flexibility.

• Great customer service. Always quick to respond to questions.
• Excellent training and documentation.
• Enterprise level security model and integration via OAuth/SAML standard for Access Management.

• Handle complex business rules.
• Test different scenarios after changes have been made.
• Allow for version control and auditing of queries and responses.

• Authoring software loading time can be slow if ruleset is very complex.

Incentivized

• The UI could be made more appealing.

There is not a single instance where they didn't respond within 8 business hours.

We also evaluated Sequel Rulebook. InRule stood out against both vendors as easy to use, product/domain focused, and enterprise-ready.

Corticon is way easier and allows for testing.

• It is always reliable and efficient.
• Has won customers over.

• It has definitely had a positive ROI. Instead of having developers try to figure out these complex rules and how to code them in a flexible way, we now have business analysts using Corticon.