Informatica Data Archive (legacy) vs. OpenText Information Archiving

To manage users, go to the admin dashboard, here is a section for users. In this users section here you can see which users are configured and you have the ability to suspend a user. If you want to edit or add users, you need to go to the Organization section, then click on another user section there, which then gives you the ability to edit or add users.

Incentivized

OpenText archive center is much appreciated with Data retention and encryption. Less appreciated when if you need to make changes to the system every time we need technical support from OpenText.

Incentivized

• It's not a major problem, but it's an example of one of many small annoyances.
• Also, there is no proper documentation available

Incentivized

• Data archival
• Data encryption
• Cloud availability

Incentivized

• No [suggestions for] improvement as such we amazed with the performance and the services
• Standalone not integrated with power center

Incentivized

• Product functionality and performance
• Cost managment

Incentivized

My company currently uses Hadoop for big data management, as well as ParAccel/Matrix databases for storing the data. The combo is fairly effective, and the only reason we are exploring ILM is because of our use of other Informatica products, and looking to build in either synergies between the technologies, or cost savings by bundling all our licensing through one vendor (Informatica)

Incentivized

I am not sure about this decision, it has been taken by our IT department.

Incentivized

• Tracking the usage of specific brackets of data across the entire organisation has now become possible.
• The team was already using PowerCenter. Therefore, using ILM was a very apt decision that allowed easier management of data at the organisation level.

Incentivized

• Dependability on OpenText in terms of technical support
• Stability and reliability

Incentivized