Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.
N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum is a cloud-based construction ERP suite with project management, accounting, resource management, and reporting and analytics. Key features include workflow automation and collaboration tools, document imaging and sharing, cost estimating tools, and RFI management tools.
N/A
Pricing
Infor VISUAL
Viewpoint Spectrum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Infor VISUAL
Viewpoint Spectrum
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Prospective buyers may contact vendor directly for a price quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Infor VISUAL
Viewpoint Spectrum
Features
Infor VISUAL
Viewpoint Spectrum
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
1.0
Ratings
153% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.3
Ratings
36% below category average
API for custom integration
1.00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
9.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Single sign-on capability
9.00 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
4.0
Ratings
57% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
3.6
Ratings
67% below category average
Dashboards
8.00 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Standard reports
2.00 Ratings
3.30 Ratings
Custom reports
2.00 Ratings
2.40 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
Accounts payable
9.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
8.00 Ratings
9.40 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
10.00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.00 Ratings
9.40 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Inventory tracking
6.00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Automatic reordering
7.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Location management
10.00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
9.7
Ratings
21% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
Pricing
10.00 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Order entry
10.00 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
10.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Order Orchestration
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
8.6
Ratings
14% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.1
Ratings
8% above category average
Billing Management
8.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
10.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
10.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Period Close
9.00 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
7.2
Ratings
6% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Project Costing
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
3.2
Ratings
79% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
2.0
Ratings
112% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Inventory Planning
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
2.0
Ratings
112% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Product Master Data Management
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.0
Ratings
36% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
3.0
Ratings
78% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.7
Ratings
2% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
The original version of Visual Manufacturing (Lilly Software) was intended for mechanical manufacturing. It was adapted at our facility (we were not the first) to accomodate electronic manufacturing. For electronic manufacturing process control it is not ideal when referencing in-line or custom processes used to build product. For material control it is excellent unless a modification to a standard product is required (and we did this on 60% of product going out the door). The co-product feature that removes material from an assembly requires the creator of the work order to calculate the percentage of cost the removed items are from the completed product. On the business operations side regional tax reports were difficult to extract and an external module to go into the data base and extract that had to be created. The system itself was stable for the most part. Occasional "data collisions" corrupted transactions at times. The accounting procedures in place found them by the end of the month .where they were corrected. For a small business with less formal processes Infor Visual can be used with little training for the operators. If the processes need a higher level of accountability and control the processes can be formalized with workflow scripts to ensure that higher level of control.
Viewpoint Spectrum would be fine for small to medium-sized companies. It would be great for transitioning from an in-house paper-based process, especially since it's designed with small construction companies in mind. They're making it even easier for smaller companies by offering additional features that you'd normally have to find in other products. However, companies can easily outgrow this system. We have about 15 years of data in the system, over 300 active jobs, and nearly 1,500 employees. In the past 3 years we've noticed slower performance and frequent locks in the system that require intervention from a system administrator. We moved to the cloud about 2 years ago and this has made troubleshooting even more difficult as we don't have the same access that we did before to resolve performance issues.
At times a "shadow part" is necessary in the manufacturing process. This shadow part does not require an inventory transaction but is made a as a separate process - sometimes out of sequence to the general process flow. Infor Visual ver 6.3.5 does not have that capability.
When generating forms for business and manufacturing operations Infor Visual ver 6.3.5 has a limited number of options. To change or add forms requires an unsupported editor. When the stock and custom options are depleted an outside programming module is required as well as programmers to develop the forms.
While free software upgrades to the main operations modules have been part of the maintenance agreement. One upgrade required database and hardware support not justifiable for the current business model. The system was frozen at the current version at that time.
There is no easy way to differentiate between engineering documentation and production documentation.
Subcontract Kiosk can be glitchy - allows subs to overbill on subcontract billing items
Document Imaging can be glitchy - often says users do not have adequate security to view/add documents, but they do - if they sign out and back in, it works fine
At times, support can be lacking - sometimes case responses are delayed or you get an incorrect answer
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
Some things in Spectrum are NOT that intuitive, but I think knowledge of the software just comes with time. There are still some things I need assistance with in Spectrum but I'm very comfortable with my day to day items now that I've been using it for years. However, if there is something I don't do often or haven't done before, I don't find the software to be that intuitive, I actually find the logic on some things to be a little weird but it's fine once I know how to do it.
For the most part the product is very reliable. Since we are hosted we sometimes have connectivity issues but I would say that is more our ISP than Spectrum.
The support has recently changed. Last year, you could call in and get an immediate response. Now that doesn't seem possible unless you have an urgent situation with access to the software, payroll or payables. I have found that using chat or e-mail works nicely for the most part, but sometimes I feel it would be easier if someone from support would jump on our site and take a first-hand look rather than going back and forth
Our trainer was excellent and navigated the time zone differences expertly. She gave us test assignments to complete and was available for questions at any time.
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.
Spectrum, when compared to Simply accounting, is better. It has more options, and it is easy to navigate. Spectrum meets our needs better. Spectrum, when compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate, is better. Spectrum has better connectivity between its project management system compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate. Spectrum, when compared to CMIC, I believe they are equal. CMiC has a better project management system, but Spectrum has an easier accounting system to navigate.
You can grant user specific access which is nice. Project managers do not need all the same modules as Accounting. But Accounting does need access to PM modules as well
Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us the opportunity to be proactive in analyzing the costs for a project in time to make a difference in the outcome of the project. It has allowed us defense in supporting our communications with the project owners.
Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us to become more productive with its accounting software and the cohesion between the modules. It has definitely streamlined the processing necessary to account for the business.