ImpactECS Enterprise Cost + Profitability Platform vs. SOLIDWORKS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ImpactECS Enterprise Cost + Profitability Platform
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
The ImpactECS Enterprise platform is designed for finance, operations, commercial, and executive teams who need deeper cost and profitability insights but are limited by technology. By replacing spreadsheets, retiring legacy applications and expanding ERP capabilities, ImpactECS supports manufacturing, distribution, and services organizations where detailed cost data is central to making…N/A
SOLIDWORKS
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Dassault Systemes offers SOLIDWORKS, a computer-aided design (CAD) system for education and manufacturing supporting 2D or 3D design, electrical design, simulations, and product development with collaboration tools.
$1,295
per year
Pricing
ImpactECS Enterprise Cost + Profitability PlatformSOLIDWORKS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Solidworks Annual Subscription
1,295
per year
Solidworks Standard
3,996
per standalone license
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ImpactECS Enterprise Cost + Profitability PlatformSOLIDWORKS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ImpactECS Enterprise Cost + Profitability PlatformSOLIDWORKS
Features
ImpactECS Enterprise Cost + Profitability PlatformSOLIDWORKS
Computer-Aided Design Software
Comparison of Computer-Aided Design Software features of Product A and Product B
ImpactECS Enterprise Cost + Profitability Platform
-
Ratings
SOLIDWORKS
7.7
Ratings
8% above category average
3D Modeling00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
2D Drafting00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Rendering and Visualization00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Parametric Design00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Collaboration and Sharing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Compatibility with other software and formats00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Assembly Design00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Simulation and Analysis00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Documentation and Annotation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customization and Extensions00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ImpactECS Enterprise Cost + Profitability PlatformSOLIDWORKS
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Teamcenter
Teamcenter
Score 8.1 out of 10
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Teamcenter
Teamcenter
Score 8.1 out of 10
Rhino
Rhino
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ImpactECS Enterprise Cost + Profitability PlatformSOLIDWORKS
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.2
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ImpactECS Enterprise Cost + Profitability PlatformSOLIDWORKS
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
As a mechanical engineer, it is one of the best tools to just start modeling and engineering with. The UI tools are intuitive and engineering analysis such Mold Analysis, FEA, are great! Other 3D CAD modeling tools have a longer learning curve to master. All in all, if you're not planning to design an entire airplane with large assembly files, then Solidworks is your tool!
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • The collaborative work environment is a cool and useful feature where groups of people can work on the same model at the same time, and SOLIDWORKS ensures that you don't overwrite each other's work.
  • The ease and amount of customization options are very useful for creating a personalized and intuitive user interface, whether SOLIDWORKS is your native CAD package or not.
  • It is very easy to quickly edit a model you have already created. The software allows sketch and feature editing without having to take the time to actually enter the sketch/feature environment.
  • The use of configurations and configurations-specific dimensions in the same sketch is very useful for creating different forms of the same part
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • To date, the baked in surfacing tools lack power compared to dedicated surfacing software.
  • In a similar vein, the core modeling kernel is not owned by SOLIDWORKS themselves and so there exists limitations with regards to implementing certain modeling/math.
  • SOLIDWORKS is playing catchup to other online vendors of CAD (notable OnShape); instead of being the once leader, they are being forced to compare themselves. This, however, may work to their advantage and in turn allow them to produce a better on-line CAD tool.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We have absolutely no reasons to not keep with SolidWorks for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I have been using SOLIDWORKS for around 12 years as of writing this review, so have learned where most things are and how they work. When first starting out it was quite daunting, but the interface is well laid out with like functions near each other which made finding new functions relatively easy.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We have an unusual arrangement. We don’t pay for support, but we’re partnered with a VAR for second-tier support.
I work with other users if I have questions but when we’ve had to ask the VAR, they always have answers. It appears that all of the VARs have access to a support platform from DS SOLIDWORKS that helps them answer most questions.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Onshape is a direct competitor. It has great entry level pricing and it is easy to access with no installation required. Being a web based app there is sometime some lag being based in NZ. Management also have concerns over where the data is stored on the cloud. With SW we can control where it is stored
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Hard to answer directly. Given our customer's needs, we absolutely have to have SW to open their file types.
  • Given the relatively limited use we need at our company, it would be useful to have a cheaper option that was more stripped down but still had some capabilities. Something in-between SW and eDrawings, for example. SW is very capable and expensive, eDrawings is free and super limited. Would be nice to have a middle option.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ImpactECS Enterprise Cost + Profitability Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of Expanded view of a single product with cost results for each cost bucket at the natural cost level.Screenshot of Configurable Dashboard view with drill down functionality.Screenshot of Functional and role-based interfaces to support workflows and define processes.