TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    iManage Work

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AiManage Work is a document management solution formerly known as HP Worksite. iManage was divested from Hewlett-Packard in 2015 and is now an independent company, headquartered in Chicago.N/A

    Oracle WebCenter Content

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AOracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.N/A
    Pricing
    iManage WorkOracle WebCenter Content
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    iManage WorkOracle WebCenter Content
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    iManage WorkOracle WebCenter Content
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of iManage Work and Oracle WebCenter Content
    Feature
    iManage Work
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    7.6
    4 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Content capture & imaging00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Document management00 Ratings8.64 Ratings
    Records management00 Ratings7.24 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation00 Ratings6.93 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Automated workflows00 Ratings7.12 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Integration00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    iManage WorkOracle WebCenter Content
    Small Businesses
    M‑Files
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Esker
    Score10 out of 10
    Epicor ECM
    Score5.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tungsten Capture
    Score8 out of 10
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Score7.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    iManage WorkOracle WebCenter Content
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (10 ratings)
    7.2
    (6 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    iManage WorkOracle WebCenter Content
    Likelihood to Recommend
    iManage
    Legal team using this product helps the team to better access documents securely within their email app (Outlook) and the user experience to control the document is excellent and being able to make it private and isolate confidential documents during a court session is very important and iManage has met our requirements. Also, being able to access instantly from users' workstation/laptop devices is very important and iManage plugin for outlook has satisfied our Business requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    iManage
    • Very reliable, once setup it is usually pretty flawless outside of Outlook-related issues.
    • Simple and easy to use organization of files and groups.
    • Customizable for different departments or sections to divide up access and partition document system.
    • Allows collaboration with outside parties and makes sharing documents quick and easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • It provided one single repository with a URL link to access each AP invoice.
    • It gives a life cycle to each invoice where a business user can perform some additional indexing as per their needs.
    • It also provides a reporting feature and a front-end for users to view invoices with ease and very helpful for auditing purpose.
    • It uses the BPEL engine to customize the life cycle and also it can automate the auto entry of supplier invoices in your EBS system.
    • Reduce a lot of manual efforts, manual errors and workforce.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    iManage
    • Proper implementation of the software is important. We have a client who also has iManage for their large in-house legal department but the implementation seems to have not been as thorough so their experience with the software has not been as positive.
    • Again, proper implementation is key to how powerful the software can be. For a long while our organization did not have the full-text searching implemented, and it was a game changer when we finally did it.
    • I understand that our implementation of iManage does not allow for multiple template matters based on different situations. So we have five default folders, but it would be nice to have a couple of templates, with different numbers and names of the subfolders depending on the situation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Some functionality you would expect to be built-in (such as reporting for compliance) is not and requires other Oracle products to be integrated.
    • Separating an invoice with multiple lines for different departments is not an easy task.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    iManage
    It has been what our firm has always used, and overall everyone seems to be pleased with it. It is user friendly and intuitive and it doesn't appear we have any intention of changing what we use for our purposes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
    Read full review
    Usability
    iManage
    To me iManage is very intuitive and user friendly. The switch from the application vs the Outlook extension was an adjustment, but it was one I made pretty easily once it happened.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    It meets all required functionality requirements -- but handles none of them in an exceptional manner
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    iManage
    We had an issue a few years ago where a plug-in of some sort which allowed the viewing of PDFs got updated and then whenever some people previewed PDFs in iManage then Outlook would crash. My outlook crashed over 20 times in a single day once. It was a pretty bad time. I know one of our information technology professionals in another office worked non-stop with iManage to get it resolved, and it seemed like they did take the issue pretty seriously.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    iManage
    I have viewed several other document management system software, but iManage was already installed at my company before I started working here. For us, I think this is the right solution. Companies with a smaller number of employees or smaller document collections could find some other options that might suite their needs and budget better. We definitely want an on premises solution that provides all the security, tracking, searching, and integration issues iManage offers. Many of the other solutions have adopted cloud technologies only at this point and we are not ready to consider cloud storage due for our sensitive documents at this point.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    iManage
    • The amount of time needed in searching is reduced to few seconds and organizing the documents by case numbers has been the best ROI for our Legal team.
    • The Automation for index searching and AI of relating to the case numbers increases the productivity for the users within our legal team where error is minimum.
    • Less efforts are required to manage Permissions and granting permissions. Applying APIs for granting permissions has been automated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%.
    • WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices.
    • WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry.
    • Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots