IFS is a low-code / no-code approach to IFS solution suite, supporting various industries including aerospace & defense, construction, energy & utilities, and manufacturing with ERP, EAM and field service management functionality. IFS Cloud can be run as a service from IFS, or in a location of choice including on-premise as a containerized application.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score 5.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Cloud
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Cloud
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Cloud
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Features
IFS Cloud
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
7.9
Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
Ratings
17% above category average
Pay calculation
8.40 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.90 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
API for custom integration
9.50 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Plug-ins
9.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
9.3
Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.3
Ratings
11% below category average
Single sign-on capability
9.00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.50 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
9.7
Ratings
29% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.8
Ratings
6% below category average
Dashboards
9.50 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Standard reports
9.50 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Custom reports
10.00 Ratings
6.10 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
9.0
Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable
9.00 Ratings
7.60 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.50 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.50 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
9.9
Ratings
22% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.3
Ratings
59% below category average
Inventory tracking
9.50 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.00 Ratings
1.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
9.3
Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
Pricing
9.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Order entry
10.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.50 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
9.50 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.9
Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.8
Ratings
25% below category average
Billing Management
8.50 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
9.50 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
9.50 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
9.00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Period Close
9.50 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.8
Ratings
14% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
Ratings
47% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.50 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Project Costing
9.00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Cost Capture
8.50 Ratings
2.10 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
9.50 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
9.3
Ratings
31% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.8
Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
Ratings
16% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
9.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
9.4
Ratings
30% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
10.0
Ratings
42% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
8.9
Ratings
28% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
9.7
Ratings
27% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
21% below category average
Production Process Design
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
9.50 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Cloud
9.4
Ratings
28% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
17% below category average
Forecasting
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
10.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
The IFS Cloud has well suited to keeping track from beginning to end and engages from the internal team to the external team very well. It takes everything with them and helps them to grow at a wide pace. It creates a systematic workflow process which helps in achieving the goal more fast and friendly environment
In the service series, there is a weakness in applying revenue recognition concepts which are a strong point of the project series. It is difficult to get a period sensitive WIP that could be recreated at any time for a point in time (fiscal period).
Ability to add companies, and sub-accounts on the fly allows for the growth of the system without conversions, and flexible reporting allows for the quick utilization of the data.
Multi-Company allows for easy and automated data entry and reporting across multiple legal entities and business segments.
Multi-Company also allows for easy centralization of business processes (AP check writing and Fixed Assets for example), while spreading data entry across the enterprise.
Ability to Copy/Paste into Dynamics SL has always been a strength- especially from Excel. The additional power of being able to use Excel for a myriad of calculations, including complex allocations, and formatting the result into a JE to paste directly into the Journal Entry Screen has saved countless hours in data-entry, and made re-use of complex items very easy.
When we have a lot of invoices rather than just a few large invoices, we can be frustrated by how long it takes Flexible Billings to generate a lot of invoices
It would be nice if Dynamics SL had an easy integration to some of the nicer salestax tools such as Avalara and CCH.
It would be nice if the fixed assets module and electronic banking were not third party.
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
I will give a full rating to this software as it has helped me in achieving the Goal faster than expected and has created a systematic work flow that helps us to increase our work productivity and have track of each and every section. It has one product that changes your organization's environment better to perfect.
SL itself is relatively easy to use and most of the Help Files documentation is well kept and outstanding in the amount of information that is given. Most end users pick up the functions quickly and are off and running after some limited training. There will always be questions and research to be done, but overall SL is relatively easy to follow for a seasoned user
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
Many times support will tell you that your issue is an identified bug and will be scheduled in the future to be fixed in a future release. The knowledgebase has gotten worse in recent years and much more difficult to use. many times you can't find the error during the search
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
User documentation of IFS Cloud is very well organized, and easy to follow. So, the time taken for the key business users to be trained is comparatively less. The integration with other well-suited third-party applications for HR and Payroll has been standardized and easy to setup, because of the REST APIs.
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew. We did try Great Plains and Peachtree (now Sage 50) and we discovered that they were rather complicated for our users. They were not as easy to maneuver and manipulate as SL and we felt that SL was much more "user friendly" and simplified, but still able to produce the same results.