IFS Applications vs. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Applications
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
An ERP primarily aimed at medium-sized companies that combines financial management capabilities contain the familiar general ledger along with expense management, accounts payable and receivable (AP/AR), advanced cost accounting, and fixed asset accounting.N/A
Pricing
IFS ApplicationsOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS ApplicationsOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS ApplicationsOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Features
IFS ApplicationsOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.6
Ratings
94% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Pay calculation4.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration4.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files3.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
API for custom integration8.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Plug-ins8.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Single sign-on capability10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.7
Ratings
6% above category average
Dashboards7.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Standard reports7.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Custom reports9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
Ratings
7% below category average
Accounts payable9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.9
Ratings
0% above category average
Inventory tracking8.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location management9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
Ratings
9% below category average
Pricing8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order entry8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Credit card processing6.00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.50 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Order Orchestration6.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
Ratings
75% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
Ratings
7% below category average
Billing Management6.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.50 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Period Close8.50 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
Ratings
6% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting3.00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Project Costing6.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cost Capture5.00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Capital Project Management2.00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance2.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.6
Ratings
63% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.8
Ratings
25% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
10.0
Ratings
29% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.4
Ratings
1% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.3
Ratings
71% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
Ratings
0% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared8.00 Ratings4.30 Ratings
Contract Authoring7.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Contract Repository7.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Supplier Management9.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
Ratings
35% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.6
Ratings
15% above category average
Risk Repository8.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Control Management8.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments8.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Issue Detection6.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
Ratings
3% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management6.00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Fulfillment Management5.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.2
Ratings
18% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
Ratings
6% below category average
Production Process Design8.50 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Production Management8.00 Ratings4.30 Ratings
Configuration Management7.50 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Work Execution8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
18% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.3
Ratings
12% below category average
Forecasting7.50 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Inventory Planning9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.2
Ratings
52% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Proposal Management7.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management7.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS ApplicationsOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS ApplicationsOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS ApplicationsOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Likelihood to Recommend
Not every Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System does not cover all the industry verticals and all the functionalities and requirements for a specific industry as built-in features. Although IFS Applications does not completely cover all the requirements and all the industry verticals, it can be implemented for any industrial company with minimum configurations and customization, which is very good when implementing an ERP system. Since it supports web and mobile versions of the application as well, the users ind it easy to use.
Read full review
If there are lot of complicated systems this might not be the best system. If you have only some complexity Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a product a technical or application person can wrap their hands around and understand the whole system.
Read full review
Pros
  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Complex Inventory
Read full review
  • JD Edwards is very configurable in handling different sales order entry scenarios.
  • JD Edwards can be customized to present focused information on the login screen of a user so a user can better focus on the applications or reports that are relevant to their job.
  • JD Edwards is also very effective in creating relationships between various customer accounts and the relationships between them.
Read full review
Cons
  • Project Budget control other than Procurement
  • Customer Advance settlement process should be Manual rather then Auto Adjustment
  • IFS GSO Support should be more proactive
Read full review
  • The interface is aging - The application has been around quite a while. Even with the more modern UI, it still feels like a 90's application and doesn't provide the quick augmentation options like what is found in Netsuite or cloud apps.
  • A premise based - It's an application that was built to run on mini/mainframe environments, which were great for its time. However, in comparison to the hand's free environments in the cloud, it requires more iron and humans to maintain the solution.
  • Speed to roll out new business models - It felt like, once you deployed a business setup, it was difficult to change and add new business features, especially those that contradict previous directions.
Read full review
Usability
In overall, the companies get many advantages, where we can forget most of the things which can be considered for room for improvement. The user interface is good. It supports mobile versions an has several mobile applications for specific areas with Android, IOS and Windows versions. It allows several deployment options such as remote hosting, IFS Cloud hosting and on-premise hosting of the servers. IFS Applications can be easily and safely integrated with other systems.
Read full review
great design and continuous improvements
Read full review
Support Rating
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Read full review
It is simple to use and implement as compared to complex softwares in the market that may take ample amount of time to implement. The budget is also slightly less to provide the same functionality that other softwares are providing. Also having Oracle database that comes with the system is much easier to handle and use and have much security.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive impact in terms of global process alignment.
  • Positive impact in terms of a single system of truth and reporting.
Read full review
  • The EnterpriseOne toolset is flexible and easily usable. Since they continue to invest and grow the product, we do get a good ROI out of it.
  • The software was already here and installed when I started at this company but the business users seemed to really like it and adapt to it well so it must feed the need to manage our inventory and financials, etc.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of