IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Onspring
Score8.7 out of 10
N/A
Onspring delivers what they describe as a flexible, no-code platform for GRC, ITSM, audit, risk, compliance and business operations.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Onspring
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Onspring
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
IFS Applications
Onspring
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
2.6
2 Ratings
94% below category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
3.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
8.5
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
9.7
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Dashboards
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
7.4
4 Ratings
4% below category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
8.6
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
5.4
4 Ratings
37% below category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
6.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
6.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
3.4
3 Ratings
75% below category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Billing Management
6.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
6.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
3.6
3 Ratings
62% below category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
10.0
1 Ratings
30% above category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
3.3
3 Ratings
71% below category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
4.6
3 Ratings
35% below category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
6.3
3 Ratings
6% below category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
5.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
6.2
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
8.5
3 Ratings
18% above category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Forecasting
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
4.2
3 Ratings
52% below category average
Onspring
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of IFS Applications and Onspring
Feature
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Onspring
8.6
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Common repository of GRC items
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Risk management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As an financial and consulting working professional we had many challenges related to being compliant with other financial and governmental regulations and standard. For that we need so many different process, business units and other interested parties to come on same table and work on every single control to get compliant with those regulations. In this case we have manage so many risks and work on timely remediation. Onspring worked well in this.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
RSA Archer is also great tool but why I choose Onspring is because it is user friendly and easy UI on the other hand Archer is so lethal and complex system which sometimes lack behind in term performance and scalability.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info